Pere gave this
commentary the headline "Amazing Grace?" with a sense of wry
emphasis on the headline. He personally hates the song but he also explores
the questions surrounding the grace attached to the song's author, the
Rev John Newton a man credited with helping to end slavery. Are
there lessons we might take on board today from the story of John Newton
and his conversion to Christianity? Do we suffer from a similar blindness?
Earlier this year, we had the two hundredth anniversary of the abolition
of the slave trade within the (then) British-controlled territories.
It was a significant important anniversary. It's a good occasion for
reflecting on the evil of viewing others as things to be owned, exploited
and consumed, and for acknowledging some of the ways in which we still
fall into that sin today.
One aspect of the anniversary was a certain amount of attention paid
to the hymn, Amazing Grace,
which is often associated with the anti-slavery movement.
Strangling the cat
I have a confession to make; I hate this hymn. The tune is doleful, the
underlying theology depressing and alienating with its emphasis on the
inherent wretchedness of the human condition, and the whole thing is incredibly
hackneyed. The fact that it seems to have an enduring popularity with
bagpipe players doesn't help, to be honest. But maybe that's just me.
What's it got to do with slavery?
The composer, the Rev John Newton,
was himself a slaver. The story is told of how he found God in a conversion
experience, gave up slave trafficking, became a priest and campaigned
for the abolition of the trade that he had once practiced.
The truth, though, is a bit more confused, and not quite so edifying.
A colourful background
Born in 1725, Newton was a sea-captain's son. He learned his trade sailing
with his father, and then served for several years as a midshipman in
the Royal Navy. His partiality for both wine and women got him into regular
trouble. After one unauthorised absence too many, he was clapped in irons
and reduced in rank to common sailor. Reckoning that his naval career
did not look promising and that slave trading offered opportunities to
make a quick buck, he asked to be exchanged into service on a slave ship.
His captain, probably glad to be rid of him, agreed.
But his start in the slave trade was not promising. Having been brought
to what is now Sierra Leone, he was beaten, abused and starved. He did
not go to sea again under his new master; he was kept as a servant and
treated, in his own view, worse than the slaves.
He stuck it out for a time in the hope of better things, but eventually
wrote and asked his father for help. His father asked a friend, a Captain
Manesty who was just then embarking on a slave-trading voyage to West
Africa, to look out for his son and if possible bring him back to England.
Which is how, early in 1748, Newton found himself on Manesty's ship, The
Greyhound, sailing for Liverpool.
Conversion
It was on this voyage that Newton had his conversion experience. The
Greyhound was nearly lost in a dreadful storm which lasted several
days. Newton, who up to this point had lived a fairly dissipated life
and had taken little interest in religion, prayed for God's mercy and
said the Lord's prayer. When the storm abated he spent the rest of the
voyage reading scripture and religious literature. By the time the ship
reached Liverpool he had had a profound conversion experience. He assented
to the teachings of Christianity, and determined to reform his life.
One change he made was to propose marriage to a Miss Catlett, a woman
whom he had up to that point been stringing along in a fairly caddish
fashion.
A man intending marriage has responsibilities, and must think of his
career. He took a post as mate with Captain Manesty. After one voyage,
he was offered, and accepted, the captaincy of another slaver, The
Duke of Argyll. On the strength of this appointment, he married Miss
Catlett
So Newton's real career as a slave trader actually began after his conversion
to Christianity.
The Christian Slave Trader
We should not doubt the genuineness of Newton's conversion. Apart from
his marriage, we know that he changed his life in other ways. He gave
up drinking, smoking and swearing, he prayed, he read scripture and theology
and he went regularly to church. He kept a spiritual diary in which he
recorded his prayers, his reflections, his resolutions and his self-doubt.
Though he had lots of self-doubt, it never extended to his profession
as a slave trader. His vocation, as he saw it, was to be a good slave
trader.
As an evangelical Christian, he treated his slaves better than most.
He did not rape the women; nor did he allow his crew to. (Rape was common,
not only because slave women were regarded as mere merchandise, but also
because they fetched a better price if pregnant.) He resolved to his slaves
"to treat them with humanity while under my power, and not render
their confinement unnecessarily grievous." He took such good
care of his cargoes that, on his last voyage, there was not one death
among the slaves, which was a rare achievement.
But when his slaves mutinied, he punished them with thumbscrews and neck-braces,
praising "the favour of Divine Providence" for his deliverance.
By the standards of the time, the penalties were mild, but it evidently
did not occur to Newton that slaves could have a just claim to freedom
or that Divine Providence might be expected to succour them as
well as him.
He found slaving unpleasant, but not immoral. "The office of
a gaoler, and the restraints under which I was forced to keep my prisoners,
were not suitable to my feelings, but I considered it as the line of life
which God in his providence had allotted to me, and as a cross which I
ought to bear with patience and thankfulness."
The truth is that, despite his conversion, Newton saw nothing wrong with
slavery or slave-trading. He believed God had given him his job, and brought
him success and miraculous protection in doing it.
When he eventually gave up slaving, it was not because of any growing
suspicion that the live of a slaver was not a fitting one for a Christian.
He gave it up for the sake of his health. After a stroke in 1755 he was
advised not to go to sea again, and so he became a surveyor in the Port
of Liverpool.
His later career
His new life on the land allowed him to work as a lay preacher, and he
found this so much to his taste that after a number years he became a
priest. After more than fifteen years of ministering in country parishes
(during which time he wrote Amazing Grace),
in 1779 he was appointed as rector of a large church in London, where
he was a highly-regarded and influential preacher. Many people sought
his counsel and advice, including a young MP called William
Wilberforce who, after a personal crisis and his own conversion
experience, was considering leaving politics for religious ministry. Newton
encouraged him to stay in parliament, and "serve God where he was".
Newton remained close to Wilberforce, and in later years supported his
campaign for abolition of slavery. In 1787 he wrote a tract on the subject,
Thoughts upon the African Slave Trade.
This, his first condemnation of slavery, comes more than forty years after
his religious conversion, and more than thirty-five years after he left
the trade himself.
Newton's later views on slavery
Newton wrote of the wickedness and devastation of the slave trade, and
his own shame at the "misery and mischief to which I have, formerly
have been an accessory to." He argued that the trade did enormous
damage to Britain, corrupting and brutalizing those involved, and killing
large numbers through storm, drink, venereal disease and slave revolts.
It may not seem the most morally compelling case against the slave trade,
but it was an effective one. Parliament found arguments from self-interest
by far the most persuasive.
It's questionable whether Newton ever really accepted the full horror
of slavery. In his epitaph, which he composed himself shortly before he
died in 1807, he described himself as "once an infidel and Libertine,
a servant of slaves in Africa". He could have said trafficker,
gaoler or even torturer of slaves, but in the end he considered himself
their "servant". He seems more concerned to emphasise what he
had done for slaves than what he had done to them, and his objections
to the institution of slavery had as much to do with its deleterious effect
on England as they had with its intrinsic injustice.
Amazing grace!
What's amazing about Newton's grace is not the effect it had on him but
the effect it didn't have on him. It opened his eyes to Jesus, but not
to the presence of Jesus in his neighbour. He knew that the gospel proclaimed
liberty to captives, and yet he couldn't see that it referred to the captives
that he himself dealt in, and profited from.
To us, it defies credibility that a man could at the same time profess
to be a Christian and yet make his living from slavery. This seems like
the rankest hypocrisy.
But we should not be too hard on Newton. He was not a hypocrite; he was
entirely sincere. And we should acknowledge that, after his initial conversion,
he had the humility to remain open to new insight and new understanding,
until he eventually arrived at a point where he did repudiate what had
once seemed acceptable to him.
The lesson for us is perhaps not the blindness of John Newton, who took
forty years to recognise a horror that we can see in an instant. Newton
was no different from us; the real lesson is that we, too, can be just
as blind.
Christian faith, however strong, does not guarantee either good sense
or sound judgment. If a mixture of conventional morality and ordinary
self-interest led the devout John Newton into complicity in a shocking
crime, then it can lead us there too.
IMAGE
SOURCES: The background image used in the headline is taken
from a photograph on the Church Times website: www.churchtimes.co.uk.
Clicking on the other images will take you to the original source.
|
Peregrinus
is a lawyer who migrated to Australia from Ireland just a few years
ago. He has a seemingly encyclopaedic knowledge of Catholic church
history and the ability at short notice to put his finger on the
facts that are needed in the many controversies that erupt on internet
discussion forums. He is based in Perth, Western Australia.
|
What are your thoughts on this commentary? You can contribute to the
discussion in our forum.
Peregrinus can be contacted at: Peregrinus
<peregrinus@catholica.com.au>
©2007
Peregrinus
|