This coming Sunday brings us the long Gospel reading of the
Passion. Today, Peregrinus explores the penchant in society for scapegoats
and discord and how Jesus offers a new way towards social communion and
unity.
The long gospel of Palm Sunday...
When I decided that for the duration of Lent I would write a series of
reflections on each Sunday's gospel, I didn't think about Palm Sunday.
The gospel for Palm Sunday is absolutely enormous nearly two full
chapters of Luke. It's so long that in many churches they will have to
read an abbreviated version; the scheduling of masses doesn't allow enough
time to read it in full. It's packed with events, packed with teachings,
and packed with figures. How to begin unpacking it in the course of a
short reflection?
I can't unpack it, of course. There isn't space or time to take everything
out, look at it properly, and see how it is connected to everything else.
The most I can do is dip in, take one or two objects out, and hold them
up for examination.
It's common, when this gospel is read liturgically, for different parts
in it to be spoken by different people the celebrant speaks the
words of Christ, various lectors speak for other figures, or read the
narration, and the congregation take the part of the crowd.
As a child, I rather liked this. It gave a degree of interest to what
would otherwise be a tediously long gospel, it gave a sense of involvement
and participation, and it was fun. You could put a bit of gusto into yelling
out "Crucify him! Crucify him!" at the appropriate time.
But it gives the crowd a miseadingly one-dimensional character. The impression
given particularly to a child is that the people of Jerusalem
are all of one mind when it comes to Jesus they all have the same
view of him, and they all want him to be dealt with in the same way, and
for the same reasons.
In fact, a moment's thought shows that this is wildly unlikely to be
true, and a reading of the gospel in its context confirms that it is untrue.
Next Sunday, if you attend a Mass at which the Palm Sunday procession
is celebrated, you'll get a second gospel the entry of Jesus into
Jerusalem, in which people spread their cloaks on the road before Jesus,
and cry "Blessings on the King who comes
in the name of the Lord!"
Are we really supposed to believe that the people who shout are the same
people who shout "Crucify him! Crucify him!" a few days later?
Lots of different perspectives...
The gospels present us with lots of different perspectives on Jesus:
- There is the perspective of the apostles, who have faith in Jesus
even if they don't always understand him, and they sometimes lack the
strength to live their faith.
- There are other followers who lose interest because they find his
teachings "too hard".
- There are people who are attracted by his signs and wonders, but who
have no interest in what he has to say.
- There are the Pharisees, very close to his thinking, but disturbed
by the directions towards which his teachings tend, and even more disturbed
by the fact that he regularly bests them in argument.
- There are the Temple authorities, fearful either for their own status
and influence, or for the threat that he presents to the uneasy peace
between Jews and Romans, or probably both.
- There are the Roman authorities, concerned to maintain the pax romana,
and willing to resort to any degree of brutality to do so.
- There are the "daughters of Jerusalem", whose
attitude to Jesus' teachings is not recorded, but who are moved by compassion
at his treatment.
- There are the Zealots, who have much in common with Jesus but who
are frustrated and resentful that he doesn't share their commitment
to radical action and active resistance to the Romans.
Jerusalem was a large and cosmopolitan city, and it is very likely that
all these groups, and more besides, were to be found there. Not to mention
the Roman, the Greeks and the Hellenised Jews, and a large number of assorted
slaves who could have come from anywhere within the Empire, or beyond.
What happened on Good Friday was that enough of these groups came together,
from their various motivations and expectations, in a shared need to find
a scapegoat. The world was not as they thought it should be. Rather than
face the challenge that this presented to their own wishes and expectations,
they wanted and needed to blame somebody else for this. They chose to
blame Jesus.
The frightening thing about this is that the people of Jerusalem are
divided in faith, divided in culture, divided in language, and divided
in what they think about Jesus Christ. But a critical mass of them overcomes
these divisions and finds unity in a shared quest to identify a common
enemy who they can blame, punish and eventually kill.
This is encapsulated at the individual level in what Luke says about
Herod and Pilate. He tell us that "though
Herod and Pilate had been enemies before, they were reconciled that same
day." And what brings them together is their shared part
in having Jesus killed.
It's about each of us, and all of us...
The good news of Jesus Christ isn't about this group or that group, this
person or that person, needing forgiveness. It's about each of us, and
all of us, needing forgiveness. And one of the things we need forgiveness
for is our way of gaining relative peace by finding a common enemy against
whom to unite.
Since the beginning of human society, our way of communion, our way of
keeping the peace, is to unify against scapegoats. That's what ritual
blood sacrifice was about in the past and that, largely is what war is
still about today.
But, as we sing when we come to receive Holy Communion, the Lamb of God
has taken away the sin of the world. The risen Jesus is our means of communion.
In other words, our way of communion, our way of having peace since the
beginning of human societies, finding and punishing a scapegoat, doesn't
have to be our way of communion any longer. In the risen Christ we have
a new source of peace for a Holy Communion, a new way of coming together
as human beings which doesn't have to be unity against anyone else.
Photo Credits:
The background frames are taken from Mel Gibson's "The Passion of
the Christ", Icon Films.
|
Peregrinus
is a lawyer who migrated to Australia from Ireland a few years ago.
He has a seemingly encyclopaedic knowledge of Catholic church history
and the ability at short notice to put his finger on the facts that
are needed in the many controversies that erupt on internet discussion
forums. He is based in Perth, Western Australia. |
What are your thoughts on this commentary? You can contribute to the
discussion in our forum.
Peregrinus can be contacted at: Peregrinus
<peregrinus@catholica.com.au>
©2008
Peregrinus
[Peregrinus' Archive]
|