|
ARTICLE
NAVIGATION: You are presently looking at Part II
PREVIOUS
| NEXT
PART I | PART II | PART III
The Book of Job is the classic text
in the Old Testament where the problem of suffering is explored in extended
detail. It attempts, if not to answer, at least to respond to, the problem
of evil, by telling this story:
Job is blessed with great wealth and a happy and healthy
family. He is devout and virtuous in his private life, and charitable
to all, especially the needy. But God allows Satan to test Job; in quick
succession Job's cattle, his sheep, his camels and his slaves are killed
by raiders, and his ten children die in a freak accident.
Job mourns and weeps, but accepts his misfortune, saying "Naked
I came from my mother's womb, and naked shall I return there. The Lord
gave, and the Lord has taken away; blessed be the name of the Lord."
God now allows Satan to attack Job himself, giving him a disfiguring disease.
His wife urges him to "curse God, and die", but Job refuses.
"Shall we receive good at the hand of God, and shall we not receive
evil?"
Four friends, hearing of his misfortunes, come to support him. The first
three friends (Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar) believe that God is just. For
them, God is a rewarder of good and punisher of evil. There is no room
in their understanding of God for suffering to have any purpose other
than retribution.. Job's suffering must be a deserved punishment for sin
They berate Job for refusing to confess his sins.
Job insists that his suffering cannot be accounted for by his sins. He
still refuses to curse God's name but, rejecting what his friends say,
he calls for a response from God himself.
At this point Elihu, the youngest of Job's friends, speaks. He condemns
the approach taken by the three friends, but also argues that Job is laying
too much stress on God's righteousness, and too little on his loving character.
Elihu describes God's power, redemptive salvation and absolute rightness.
Elihu's role in the story is to prepare for the appearance of God, who
now intervenes in response to Job's call.
God describes the experience of being responsible for the world, and asks
if Job has had the experiences that God has had. Job shares the world
with countless other creatures, with lives and needs of their own. The
young of some creatures hunger in a way that can only be satisfied by
taking the lives of others. Does Job even have any experience of the world
he lives in? Does he understand what it means to be responsible for such
a world? Job admits that he does not, and asks God for forgiveness.
In an epilogue, God condemns Eliphaz, Bildad and Zophar (but not Elihu)
for speaking wrongly of God's motives and methods, commands them to make
sacrifices and tells Job to pray for their forgiveness. He then restores
Job to health, giving him twice what he had before (including ten new
children). Thereafter Job has a long, prosperous and holy life and a happy
death.
What are we to make of this?
The question "why does Job suffer?" is never actually answered.
Only one answer is really considered - that suffering is essentially a
punishment for sin - and that is decisively rejected. If there is a message
in the Book, it is that Job should not look for an answer; it would be
beyond him to grasp it, if offered.
The American theologian John Yoder, who was never afraid of offering
a difficult answer to a difficult question, builds on this idea by attacking
the whole idea of theodicy, as the "justification of God". Yoder
ask, who are we to justify or evaluate God? What criteria do we use? Why
are they the right criteria? Yoder doesn't deny the apparent conflict
between our idea of God and the reality of evil, but he thinks it's wrong
to try to explain it away in our own terms. Anger at God, he thinks, would
be a more honest, and more loving, response than metaphysical exercises
designed to reconcile two irreconcilables in terms that we can understand.
We are called to have faith in the loving God despite the reality of evil,
not to re-imagine God in some way that enables him to fit within the limits
of our own minds along with the reality of evil. It diminishes not only
God but also us to try to offer a neat answer to this apparent paradox.
But all of that offers stark comfort for someone struggling with suffering
in their own lives, seeking to turn to God for support while being tested
as Job was tested.
The Incarnation
Christianity offers a further perspective. The Incarnate Christ does
not answer the problem of evil for us. But, what is more important
and more valuable, he shares the problem with us. As
a man he suffers, and as a man he grows through that suffering to become
all that he was destined to become. So God
is not just the God who allows me to suffer; he is the God who shares
the human experience of suffering with me. We
may be unable to comprehend God's purpose in suffering, but God can and
does share our experience of it.
There is no greater suffering than watching the suffering of someone
you love. Every good marriage, every profound friendship, learns this
at some cost. You know that if one of you suffers, the other will want
to assume that suffering, if it could be done. Any parent watching the
suffering of a child knows the same feeling. Paul points this out: "Indeed,
only with difficulty does one die for a just person, though perhaps for
a good person one might even find courage to die. But God proves his love
for us in that while we were still sinners Christ died for us."
(Rom 5: 7-8). God's love for us is unimaginably
generous, and it leads him to the cross. This is
a big part of whatever lesson the inescapable reality of suffering has
to teach us.
ARTICLE
NAVIGATION: You are presently looking at Part II
PREVIOUS
| NEXT
PART I | PART II | PART III
Photo
Credit: Animation by Brian
Coyne. The hands are adapted from artwork by Sieger
Köder.
|
Peregrinus
is a lawyer who migrated to Australia from Ireland just a few years
ago. He has a seemingly encyclopaedic knowledge of Catholic church
history and the ability at short notice to put his finger on the
facts that are needed in the many controversies that erupt on internet
discussion forums. He is based in Perth, Western Australia.
|
What are your thoughts on this commentary? You can contribute to the
discussion in our forum.
Peregrinus can be contacted at: Peregrinus
<peregrinus@catholica.com.au>
©2007
Peregrinus
[Peregrinus' Archive]
|