
In this detailed
commentary Fr Daniel Donovan endeavours to break apart the nature of the
crisis in participation and morale being experienced by the Church, both
locally and internationally, at the moment. It is a potentially explosive
analysis with his revelations of a recent Open Letter to the Priests of
the Archdiocese of Sydney from Dr Dennis Dubro, the former Bursar at the
Opus Dei-managed Warrane College whose letter "warns of the dangers
of Opus Dei and its unbridled activity and power in the structures (and
worship) of the Local Church". Fr Donovan is concerned at the appeasement
that seems to be underway at a high level in the Church for dissident
elements who at every turn have endeavoured to undo the work of the Second
Vatican Council. Fr Donovan charts how at a number of significant levels
there has been a decisive shift away from the spirit and intent of what
the collective Church Fathers charted as the future for the Church at
the Second Vatican Council. He concludes by arguing that the responsibility
of the Church's bishops is "to uphold with
courage and imagination the work of Vatican II so that God's Spirit might
continue to renew the whole earth" and not be engaged in this
constant "appeasment of the disaffected".
"Crisis of belief in Christ" or "Crisis
in Leadership"?
Over recent years there has been a mantra acclaiming that there is a
crisis in the church. There has been a tendency among the hierarchy from
the Vatican down to the local bishops to describe it as a "crisis
of faith" or a "crisis of belief in Christ." While it is
true that Church authorities are correct in identifying that there is
a crisis, they are incorrect in naming it as a crisis in faith or in belief
in Christ. The real crisis is in leadership. People want a bishop and
indeed a hierarchy which has a vision and creative imagination. The Church
is the people of God with a mission to be in the world as a sign of "the
permanent presence of Jesus" (Evangelii Nuntiandi
[EN] #15). If the Church is to achieve this mission then its leaders
must be able to nourish the community and to build it up for service.
Following the initiative of Jesus, the Church must serve and be prepared
to "lay down its life "for the ransom of the many" (Mk
10:45). A servant Church demands pastoral leaders.
The Chinese word for "crisis" is composed of two characters
the first of which means "danger" and the second "adventure."
Thus a crisis contains both danger and adventure and the resolution of
these two provides a dynamic which finds itself at the heart of pastoral
leadership and a corresponding ecclesiology. The local Church is the people
of God who journey in living faith toward the Kingdom and therefore the
Local Church is always in need of reforming and re-orientation by the
Spirit. Ecclesia semper reformanda est, was the traditional maxim
which expressed this truth. During Vatican II, the Church underwent a
process of reorientation to build up the community for service opening
the Church up to the needs of the world (Mt 25:45).
The Church's power was to be the Holy Spirit "who blows where
he pleases" (Jn 3:8). Church authority,
on the other hand is meant to be service (Lk 22:24-27).
Therefore the Church must be a pilgrim who does
not settle in the past which is the inheritance of all members of the
Church but journeys under the power of the
Spirit with hope toward God's future. Recently, the
article on Facing the People, (Catholica
4th July 2007), reported that Pope Benedict XVI was considering
a new order of the Mass, a Latin rite to attract back to the Church the
"disaffected." The article explains that there are about 600,000
Catholics and 400 priests involved in these groups and societies. However
should the Pope decide to create this new order of the Mass then he is
establishing a very dangerous precedent for the Church generally. There
are many more than 600,000 Catholics throughout the world who have been
forced out of the Church because of their marital status. The numbers
of "disaffected Catholics" who have joined the Hillsong church
because they are not able to practise their faith in the Catholic Church.
"Disaffected priests" who have left the ministry are prevented
from even doing a reading in the liturgy. Disaffected women who are unable
to be ordained. Therefore if the Pope is committed to providing for those
disaffected who want the Latin Mass then he must demonstrate the same
concern for those who are similarly disaffected but for other reasons.
Vatican II established that it is inappropriate to create "new rites"
even when such rites were designed for the greater benefit of specific
groups within the community. One such group is children. Vatican II, considered
the possibility of developing a rite of eucharist for children. The discussion
of this topic ended with the rejection of any consideration of a new rite
for children. Rather it was argued that the eucharist is an ecclesial
action even when it was celebrated with a specific group for example children.
Therefore the Directory for Masses with children, adapted the official
rite which is contained in the Sacramentary of Vatican II.
The Directory clearly, enunciates three principles to be observed in
Masses with children. Firstly, adaptation:
it is a Mass "with" children not "for" children. Therefore
it is intended that while the rituals, rites and prayers can be adapted
to foster the children's "authentic, conscious and active participation"
(DMC#12) it will always involve the community.
Two types of celebration were established for Masses with children: those
Masses in which there were many adults and few children, such as on Sunday
or a major feast. The second celebration was of Masses in which there
were few adults and many children such as school Masses. Yet even in this
second type of celebration, the Mass was to retain its distinctive character
as an ecclesial action. The adults present must take active parts so that
the children can experience the communal nature of the Mass and its many
ministries. Children needed to experience that there were many ministries
but one act of worship (General
Instruction for the Roman Missal [GIRM] #5, Directory for Masses for Children
[DMC] #12).
Secondly, the principle of participation requires that the adapted rite
would allow the specific group to enter into the meaning of the rituals,
rites and prayers at their level of development (DMC#2,
12). Active participation requires that the group would be prepared
for the celebration through appropriate catechesis and that the celebration
would be followed by a further catechesis in order that the children might
gain greater spiritual benefit from their participation in the paschal
mystery (DMC#8) and would gradually develop
a "living faith" which works through love (DMC#55).
Thirdly, the Directory identifies the principle of formation. Through
their involvement with the Christian community and sharing in its worship,
the children are nurtured and educated in their faith. Through baptism
the children become members of the Christian community and gather with
their parish family to praise and thank God for the great gifts of creation
and salvation in Jesus. Long before the children can explain the mystery
which they celebrate they are being formed. Gathered in the community,
the smells, sounds, gestures, colours, music, etc begin to impress the
children's senses through the liturgy's "inherent power to teach."
Children begin to develop the sense of belonging to God's family and a
sense of the sacred.
Here is a wonderful example of formation in the following true story.
One Sunday a mother had to take her two year old son to Mass because her
husband was away. All parents will know the "terrible two's".
Usually, the parents attended different Masses so that their son stayed
at home. On this particular Sunday the responsorial psalm was the Twenty-third
psalm and the people were singing, "The
Lord is my Shepherd, there is nothing I shall want". Suddenly,
the mother noticed that her son was listening most intently. When the
verse was sung for the third time, the child shouted "yes
there is! I want a train set!" Formation! Sure was. The
adults were singing words but the child focussed on the meaning. Why have
a Shepherd-Lord if you do not express your needs to him?
Meaning and Language
It is the purpose of the liturgy, to consecrate the community which gathers
in the Spirit and in obedience to the command of Jesus to "do this
in my memory." Eucharist is about life. The rhythm of the liturgy
itself supports this link: the Spirit gathers the people in from daily
life and work (Introductory Rites) and then in the Spirit the people are
sent forth (Concluding Rite) to be and live eucharist in the world until
they are again gathered in to celebrate the mystery of Jesus in word and
sacrament.
In the film, The Breach, which
is a true story based on the life of Robert Hanssen who was in charge
of the Russian desk at the FBI. Hanssen was a devout catholic who attended
daily Mass (and Latin Mass on Sunday). Yet the meaning of eucharist escaped
him, his life was completely quarantined from the meaning and purpose
of his liturgical participation. Because of his position in the FBI, Hanssen
had access to the classified secrets of the United States Government and
he passed on this material to the KGB. Hanssen's treachery resulted in
the death of at least 50 agents whose identity was revealed in the traded
documents.
Words and language are symbols which convey meaning. It is very hard
to translate meaning from one language to another. It is hard to capture
the exact nuance of "words" in translations and not infrequently,
the translator provides an interpretation of the text rather than its
exact meaning. For example, in French the saying, cela va sans dire
is fine but when translated into English literally as, that goes without
saying, the meaning and impact of the original French idiom is lost.
For this reason, Latin liturgy is fine for Latin speakers whose reality
is the Latin culture. However, it is inappropriate to impose a Latin liturgy
upon a Church in a modern cultural milieu. Liturgy draws upon the popular
culture and the life experience of the celebrating community and therefore
should be celebrated in the mother tongue. Monsignor Dupanloup who was
a prominent bishop at Vatican I (1870), stated
that "no one should be asked to pray in any language other than his
(her) own."
While it is true that language is analogical and is a means to an end
rather than the end itself. This is not to say that some of the Gregorian
Chants and Latin hymns are never to be used in worship but it is to stress
that the liturgy is more than language. Liturgy is about meaning and relevance
of that meaning to life. Likewise it is imperative that in this day and
age that the Church be allowed to move ahead into the new Pentecost in
which the Holy Spirit will gather all people to hear and tell the wonderful
deeds of God in his or her own language (Acts 2:12).
To go back to Latin would create a clerical liturgy once more and exclude
the people from gaining the maximum benefit and meaning from the liturgy.
The celebrating community itself is the living tradition (EAW#28),
and the language used should allow the community to gain the maximum spiritual
benefit from their celebration. This would have been a useful insight
for Robert Hanssen in his spirituality (DMC#55).
Unknown Woman Disciple and Meaning in Mark 14
Mark's Passion Narrative begins with an interesting scenario of a woman
coming into Simon's house where Jesus is having a meal at Bethany. The
woman goes up to Jesus and anoints his head with a "costly nard"
(Mk 14:4). Jesus is most impressed with her
action and tells those present that wherever the gospel is preached that
her action would be told "in remembrance of her" (Mk
4:9). This woman disciple is contrasted by Mark, with two of the
male disciples, Judas (Mk 14:10-11) who betrayed
Jesus and Peter (Mk 14:26-32) who denied Jesus.
Mark also, includes the institution of the eucharist in this context (Mk
14 22-25).
The point of the story is that the unknown woman by pouring the oil over
Jesus' head recalls the ritual by which the priest, prophets and kings
were anointed for mission in ancient Israel. By her action, the woman
reveals Jesus' mission, as God's suffering Messiah/Servant. She lifts
the pall of secrecy which has shrouded his ministry throughout Mark's
gospel (Mk 3:21) and even in his last hours,
Judas and Peter still lack this specific insight. The unknown woman grasps
the meaning. God's Spirit has broken into time through Jesus and "the
Good News will be proclaimed to all creation" (Mk
16:16). In the context, Mark shows that the eucharist extends this
meaning as Jesus pours out his covenant blood "for the salvation
of the many" (Mk 14:26).
The Relationship between the Universal and the Local Church
In the Apostolic Exhortation, On Evangelisation
in the Modern World (Evangelii Nuntiandi [EN]) Pope
Paul VI describes the relationship between the Universal and the Local
Church. It is clear that there are not two Churches but rather that the
Local Church is the incarnation of the Universal Church. Thus the Pope
writes:
Nevertheless this Universal Church is in practice incarnate
in the individual Churches made up of such and such an actual part of
mankind, speaking such and such a language, heirs of a cultural patrimony,
of a vision of the world, of a historical past, of a particular human
substratum. Receptivity to the wealth of the individual Church corresponds
to special sensitivity of modern man. (EN#62)
Let us be very careful not to conceive of the Universal Church as the
sum, or, if one can say so, the more or less anomalous federation of essentially
different individual Churches. In the mind of the Lord, the Church is
universal by vocation and mission, but when she puts down roots in a variety
of cultural, social and human terrains, she takes on a different external
expression and appearances in each part of the world.
Clearly,
people experience Church in their local community which participates in
the vocation and mission of the Universal Church. However within the Local
Church there must be, as the Pope points out, many models, many ways in
which people from a particular country, language, culture, historical
background, world view and identity live the reality of Church. Today
this reality is under attack as the local bishops are becoming more and
more disconnected from their people. There is an all consuming obsession
by the hierarchy with the Universal Church and a neglect of the Local
Church. As the priest numbers continue to dwindle and grey, bishops should
be imaginatively searching for new structures and ways to meet the pastoral
needs of the new millennium. Unfortunately, there has been a rather knee
jerk reaction with the emphasis on the ordained ministry alone. For example,
priests from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds with different
experiences of Church are placed in Australian parishes. As a result the
Australian character of the parish undergoes a metamorphosis, as the parish
is informed by the spirituality and customs of the clergy. Frequently,
these parishes become centres for specific nationalities with the resulting
disaffection of the Australian parishioners. There is a need to consider
the liturgical and spiritual character of the Local Church and to undertake
a whole review of ministry but this will never be done, while the focus
is only on "ordained ministry. There is much to be learnt from those
parishes which have had a lengthy history of lay leadership.
In the forty-two years since Vatican II, local communities have developed
more inclusive liturgies according to the principles of adaptation, participation
and formation which were enunciated above. Unfortunately, these liturgies
are spied upon by the more conservative groups who frequently do not belong
to the community on which they are reporting. Generally, this spying is
followed up with reports to the local bishop who will approach the priest
and community to answer the charges reported. However, it is common practice
that the community is not given the name of those making the allegations.
Local Church and Structures
Not only is the specific identity of the Local Church struggling with
the influx of clergy from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds
but there is the very specific model of Church in Opus Dei. This is a
particular concern as the Opus becomes more prominent in the Local Church.
The recent Draft pastoral plan for the Archdiocese of Sydney fails to
guard the integrity of the Local Church. Committees, offices and commissions
which will determine the pastoral and liturgical landscape of the Archdiocese.
This structure allows for the effective control and shaping of the Local
Church according to Opus Dei design. In his book, Their
Kingdom Come: Inside the Secret World of Opus Dei,
Robert Hutchison writes,
Opus Dei operates in an almost medieval vacuum. Because
of its insufficiency of its institutions the Vatican is not equipped to
regulate a worldwide conglomerate. Canon law was never designed to govern
an organization whose roster of activities is unknown to a majority of
its members. The Vatican's lack of oversight gives Opus Dei unrestrained
freedom; its incorporation as an enterprise of pontifical right provides
it with the necessary standing to function in other jurisdictions without
submitting the sum, or even certain of its parts, to the laws and regulations
of those jurisdictions. (p.414)
How can Local Church survive without strong leadership by the local bishop?
Yet local bishops seem to be more concerned with pilgrimages and free
coffee shops, rather than the real issues in parishes. The recent Draft
Pastoral Plan for the Archdiocese of Sydney represents a clear failure
in facing the real issues in pastoral planning as the Church moves into
the new millennium. The plethora of committees, offices and commissions
would simply ensure that there could never be any serious input from parishes
and that there would never be any relevant outcomes. The document presents
an ecclesiastical version of "big government" or should it be
"yes, bishop?" The details for Church life expressed in this
document are "good ideas" which lack substance and any relevance
to active participation or the daily life of God's people.
Hutchison raises another problem concerning the role of the Opus Dei
Prelate in Church structures. In effect, the prelature is a Church within
a Church. Dr Denis Dubro writes in an open letter (19th
May 2007) to priests in the Archdiocese of Sydney that Opus Dei
"
employs all the methods and techniques
of a cult" (p.2). Dubro, warns
of the dangers of Opus Dei and its unbridled activity and power in the
structures (and worship) of the Local Church. In fact, Dubro states quite
emphatically that Opus Dei should be "a separate church".
Maria del Carmen Tapia writes in, Beyond
the Threshold: A Life in Opus Dei, of the penchant of Opus
Dei to insinuate itself into the structures, agencies and the daily life
of the Local Church through rather questionable strategies. Dubro is more
precise when he labels these strategies and techniques as "orchestrated
public shows," presenting Opus Dei as simply helping members to "live
a more spiritual life (Dubro p.4). Such an
image of Opus Dei is dispelled when its strategies and methods are more
critically examined. Hutchison (Their kingdom come:
p.258), provides some vivid accounts of these strategies at work
when he details the events surrounding the expulsion of Maria del Carmen
from Opus Dei by its authorities. The beleaguered woman was required to
confess her guilt and when she did not comply, she was accused unjustly
of serious misdemeanours and Mgr Escriva promised that he would undertake
"extra flagellation for her salvation."
Since the Opus Dei is allowed to continue to proselytise from within
the Local Church and to swell its numbers with bishops, priests, religious
laity and young people from the parishes, there is a major structural
concern. What is the role and the power of the Prelate vis-à-vis
the role of the Pope? While Pope Benedict XVI is the head of the Church,
is he not shadowed by the Prelate of Opus Dei, Monsignor Javier Echevarria?
Is not the new rite of the Mass (Latin), intended to placate the Opus
Dei? Can the Pope rein in the power of Opus Dei? Under what conditions
could the bishops, clergy religious and laity who are members of Opus
Dei be expected to be loyal to the Prelate and not the Pope? People in
the Local Church have a right to answers to these and similar questions
from their local leaders or bishop and there is a corresponding duty on
the leaders to provide the answers. Otherwise the Local Church will be
absorbed into the Opus Dei structure and model of Church in much the same
manner as multi-national companies consume local businesses.
Gerard Henderson writing in the Sydney Morning Herald (19th
June 2007) used the analogy of the Church as a company and the
bishop as "a chief executive officer." Henderson by using this
analogy seeks to defend the right of the bishop to speak out on community
issues and of course, this right has never been denied but Henderson fails
to state that his analogy also, implies that the bishop is duty bound
to protect his company (Church) from take over bids from multi-nationals.
This is the real pastoral need today as the Local Church struggles to
retain its own identity against Opus Dei and other such movements imported
from other cultures.
Vatican II envisaged a process of inculturation by which the Local Church
would gradually, bring faith and culture into a dynamic process which
would promote the mission of the Church within that cultural milieu. Pope
Paul describes the Church as "a precious
living heritage not in order to keep it hidden but to communicate it"
(EN#15). The Church itself is the "living
tradition" and through the Spirit will guarantee its authenticity
throughout the world.
In a lecture delivered at Weston, the Jesuit School of Theology, in
Cambridge Massachusetts shortly before his death, Fr Karl Rahner referred
to work of Vatican II as a "quantum leap" the likes of which
had not been experienced in the Church since the Council of Jerusalem
(Acts 15). At Jerusalem, the fledgling Church
made a break with Judaism and declared that faith in Christ and not the
practices of the Law brought salvation. Rahner explained
that Vatican II made a similar leap to abandon the Euro-centricity and
became a world Church which embraced all cultures.
Many of the disaffected, after the Council of Jerusalem remained in the
community and continued to hamper the work of Paul among the Gentiles
converts by their insistence on the acceptance of the Jewish Law. After
Vatican II, there was a similar retention of the disaffected within the
Church and like the Judaisers in the early community, they challenge the
shift toward inculturation of the Universal Church in the Local Churches
and world cultures. Today the responsibility of Church leaders, is not
necessarily to appease the disaffected, but to uphold with courage and
imagination the work of Vatican II so that God's Spirit might continue
to renew the whole earth.

Further
Reading:
Dubro, D (2007)* Open letter to the priests of the Archdiocese of Sydney
Hutchison, R. (1977) Their Kingdom Come : Inside the secret world of
Opus Dei, Great Britain: Corgi Books.
John Paul II,** Ecclesia in Oceania (EO), On Jesus Christ and the Peoples
of Oceania: Walking his way, telling his truth, living his life,
http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/apost_exhortations/documents/hf_jp-ii_exh_20011122_ecclesia-in-oceania_en.html
Tapia, M del C, (1999) Beyond the threshold: Life in the Opus Dei,
New York: Continuum Publications Co.
Pope Paul VI, Evangelii Nuntiandi, Apostolic Exhortation of Paul VI
On the church in the modern world, Sydney: St Pauls Publications.
General Instruction on the Roman Missal (GIRM) this is the introduction
to the Vatican II Sacramentary. This is the book which the priest uses
for the prayers, eucharistic prayers etc at Mass
Directory for Masses with Children (DMC) this is the adaptation
of the GIRM for parents, teachers and pastors who need to prepare and
implement liturgies with children
Environment and Art in Christian Worship (EAW) this is a document
of the United States Catholic Conference which highlights the community
as the major symbol of the presence of Jesus.
These last three documents are available in:
Lysik D., (Editor, 2004) The Liturgical Documents: A parish resource,
Chicago: Chicago: Liturgy Training Publications.
*Dr Denis Dubro was a member of Opus Dei for seventeen years. He was a
bursar at Warrane College at University of New South Wales in Kensington.
Denis was expelled from Opus Dei for his questioning and failure to accept
the views of his Director.
** Note the different approach to the Local Church and its relationship
to the culture from the approach in Evangelii Nuntiandi by Pope Paul VI
in which the Pope describes the Local Church as the Universal Church putting
down roots in a variety of cultures (EN#62). Pope Paul in this same paragraph
explains that a Church which is "toto orbe diffusa" (spread
throughout the whole world) is an "abstraction if it did not take
body and life through the individual Churches." This is the risk
for the Australian Church today. The document Ecclesia in Oceania (EO)
followed the Synod which put pay to the Australian identity of the Local
Church and has resulted in a new wave of conservative clergy coming as
missionaries to serve the parishes in major cities. Combining parishes
and the different experiences of "being church" has resulted
in disaffection among Australian catholics. The problems of the "Australian
Church" have been exacerbated today by an ever widening "disconnect"
between the people and the hierarchy. It seems that the time has come
to revisit the basic truth that the Church is always in need of reform
and implementing the real insight of Paul VI (EN #15) when he stated that:
"The Church is an evangeliser, but she begins by being evangelised
herself. She is the community of believers, the community of hope lived
and communicated, the community of brotherly love; and needs to listen
unceasingly to what she must believe, to her reasons for hoping, to the
new commandment of love. She is the People of God immersed in the world
and often tempted by idols, and she always needs to hear the proclamation
of the mighty works of God".
 |
Fr
Daniel Donovan is a lecturer in the School of Religious Education
at the Strathfield campus of ACU National. He has a long history
in the education of primary school teachers in Religious Education.
He has given special attention to teaching beliefs and values courses,
and to field supervision of students in practicum. Further details
about his research interests and contact details can be found on
the ACU National website at rel-ed.acu.edu.au/ren2/staff.html.
|
What are your thoughts on this commentary, and on the Draft Pastoral
Plan? You can contribute to the discussion in our forum.
©2007
Daniel Donovan
[Index of Commentaries by Fr Daniel
Donovan]
|