Home
Subscribe
Go to Our Forum – the heart of Catholica
Index of Emails
Pray-As-You-Go Daily Meditation
http://www.pray-as-you-go.org
Contact Us
Donate to Catholica
Advertise With Us
Index of Advertisements
Forum Guidelines
Index of Lead Commentaries
Index of News Stories
Index of Editorials
Index of Multi-Media Commentaries
Catholica Video Channel


Index of all Contributors
Dawn Bowie
Francis Brown
John Chuchman
Fr Patrick Collins
Dr Paul Collins
Brian Coyne
Fr Daniel Donovan
Fr Tom Doyle
Fr Peter Dresser
Dr Ian Elmer
Dr Graham English
Vince Exley
Bill Farrelly
Dr Brian Gleeson CP
Kerry Gonzales
Daniel Gullotta
Fr Eric Hodgens
Vynette Holliday
Dr Andrew Kania
Gabe Lomas
Dr Anthony Lowes
Milly/Amanda McKenna
Fr John McKinnon
Tom McMahon
Fr Kevin Murphy
Vinnie Nauheimer
Fr John O'Keefe
Dr Anthony Padovano
Dr Allan Patience
Peregrinus
Bishop Pat Power
George Ripon
Holy Irritant/Tony Robertson
Dr Christine Roussel
Emmy Silvius
Richard Sipe
Prof Len Swidler
Kate's TakeWendy's Take
Dr Dick Westley
Occasional Contributions
Lighter Material & Satire
Cindy the Sacristan
View from the Cloister
Ruth's Take
Farmer Jack & Pope Benny
Index to Special Series
Exit Stories
In-depth Interviews with Catholic Leaders
Dr Peter Tannock
Diarmuid O'Murchu
Bishop Kevin Manning
Michael Morwood
Catholica Conversations
Catholic Education
Tom Lee – First 500 Years
Cardinal Mehony – A Novel
Robert Blair Kaiser
Seven Deadlies
Special Editions
Spirituality of Thomas Merton
Sunday Reflections
Sunday Forum
Bishop Geoffrey Robinson
Youth Perspectives
Y-not Question the Sunday Readings
Catholica YouTube Channel
OnLine Catholics Archives
New Catholic Times
Catholics for Ministry
ABC Religion & Ethics Newsletter

www.google.com


Catholica Web

GOOGLE ADVERTISING
Catholica does not necessarily endorse these advertisers. Please use appropriate caution and notify us of inappropriate ads.

DONATE NOW!
Spirituality for Adults

Email a friend Email this page to a friend

Print Print friendly view

Comment Post your feedback in our forum

Dr IAN ELMER…

CLICK HERE FOR INDEX TO THIS SERIES ON ST PAUL

Paul and the Elephant

Dr Ian Elmer begins hts commentary today with the provocative statement "all religions are, in some sense, human inventions" and proceeds to discuss some of the commonalities between different religions before seeking to draw out the uniqueness of Christianity...

All religions are, in some sense, human inventions…

I have always felt that the divine ground of being, call him/her/it God, Godde, the Prime Mover, the Force, or the Great Bird of the Universe, has no need of our rituals, prayers and other faith-practices. We are the ones who need faith, myth and ritual to bring meaning into our lives. We are the ones who invent religion and design schools of prayer and worship to centre or focus our lives on the ultimate reality that we believe underpins all human existence.

The world's cultures offer us a smorgasbord of human aspirations for meaning and hope as expressed in a multiplicity of religious practices. Accordingly, many people today argue that all religions are basically the same. All devotees worship the one divine reality.

Understanding Religious Life by Frederick StrengOn one level this is true; all religions seek what the sociologist Frederick Streng (1976) called "ultimate transformation" of our mundane existence via encounter with the ultimate ground of being. Within this broad definition, Streng identifies a number of parallel "ways of being religious" common to all such religions. More broadly, we might say that most of the world's great religions sponsor prayer, meditation, contemplation of the sacred as a primary means of making the spiritual journey, thereby transcending the meaningless of a purely secular or profane existence. It is often more a matter of us exploring different "corners" on the same map!

Three men, an elephant and a dark room…

By way of analogy, one might appeal to the old proverbial story of the "three men and the elephant in a dark room". It goes like this: "One of the men runs into a leg and claims it's a tree. Another grabs the trunk and proclaims it's a snake. While the third man gets hit with the tail and says it is a rope. All the men are describing the same thing but just have different experiences". This analogy has been used to explain the plurality of religions as different interpretations of the one, ultimate reality.

With that scenario in mind, we might observe that both Paul and the Apostles (especially Peter and Jesus' brother James) claimed to have had Christophanies — apparitions, even revelations, from the risen Christ; but they each interpreted their experience of encounter with the divine differently.

Paul's experience led him to "convert" to the Hellenists' Law-free mission, while the experience of Peter and James led them to remain Law-observant Jews and even oppose the Law-free mission (Donaldson, 1997).

Perhaps numinous experiences do not impart actual messages. Does God speak directly to the recipient of such an experience, or does the recipient "interpret" the experience according to his or her own presuppositions and assumption?

At the time of his conversion, Paul was persecuting the Hellenists, so his numinous experience on the road to Damascus led him to believe that God wanted him to change his ways and convert to the Hellenists Law-free movement. Peter and James knew Jesus to be Law-observant so they interpreted their Christophanies as confirmation of what they were already doing.

Having said that, however, I am sure that both Paul and the Apostles would be the first to take issue with the modern idea that all religions are the same; or that all religious devotees are equally in possession of the "truth" or "reality" – by which I mean the correct understanding of what constitutes both the "sacred" and the "profane", as well as how the two are related.

Eastern religions, like Buddhism, Taoism and Hinduism, are becoming increasingly popular in the West, and devotion to these ancient cultic practices is rapidly displacing former Christian devotions. But there are very clear differences between Christianity and these faiths; one cannot simply "mix and match".

The Christian reliance on Revelation…

Our claim as Christians rests, not on experience per se, but on the notion of revelation — that the Divine has chosen to communicate with we mere humans. It is only through this self-revelation and self-communication that God imparts knowledge concerning the nature of divine "being" and opens the lines of communication between the Divine and the Human.

Buddhist Monks at prayerReligions like Buddhism and Taoism are unashamedly philosophical systems, which make no claim to revelation. Only the proponents of Judeo-Christian-Muslim traditions claim to be the recipients of direct revelation from the divine. Much of that revelation is incompatible with the eastern philosophies; even though they may share many of the same "ways of being religious", they offer very different understandings of both the concept of "ultimate meaning" or the "ultimate ground of being" (i.e. the "sacred") and that of the "ultimate transformation" that results from encounter with that meaning. The east is wont to view the world as an illusion and the deity as an impersonal force or polytheistic reality, while the west champions a vision of corporeal existence created and sustained by a personal deity. The two systems are not easily compatible.

The process of knowing ultimate reality is a far more complex one than merely encountering an elephant in the dark. God, the divine realm, the Force, or the Great Mother — whatever we might like to term the alleged "other" — is not, by definition, subject to sense perception or scientific investigation.

The uniqueness of Christianity lies in the fact that the devotee relies solely on faith — faith in the body of revelation contained partially in the Bible, but fully and infallibly in the "interpretive" community of which the Biblical texts are an expression. The template for the "elephant" had already been "revealed" to the community long before those famous three men ever entered that darkened room. Paul's numinous encounter with the risen Jesus on the road to Damascus did not shed light into a darkened room, but merely brought fresh perspective on what Paul already knew and believed.

“The uniqueness of Christianity lies in the fact that the devotee relies solely on faith — faith in the body of revelation contained partially in the Bible, but fully and infallibly in the "interpretive" community of which the Biblical texts are an expression.” …Ian Elmer

CLICK HERE FOR INDEX TO THIS SERIES ON ST PAUL

Bibliography and Further Reading:
For those who are looking for resources on Paul that are both reliable and readable, I can recommend the following:
T. Donaldson, "Israelite, Covert, Apostle to the Gentiles: The Origin of Paul's Gentile Mission" in R. N. Longenecker (ed.), The Road to Damascus: The Impact of Paul's Conversion on His Life, Thought and Ministry (Grandrapids: Eerdmans, 1997), 62-84.
F. Streng, Understanding Religious Life 2nd ed. (Encino, CA: Dickenson, 1976)

Photo Credits:
The headline image of St Paul has been sourced from an icon which you will find at: www.airmaria.com. Clicking on the other images will take you to the original source.

Ian ElmerDr Ian Elmer is a lecturer in New Testament at ACU National (formally Australian Catholic University). He is also a member of the Centre for Early Christian Studies, and was recently admitted into ACBA (Australian Catholic Biblical Association). His research specialities are Paul and First-Century Christianity. He is the author of published articles in the Australian Ejournal of Theology and in Prayer and Spirituality in the Early Church (a publication of the Centre for Early Christian Studies). He doctoral thesis was entitled Paul, Jerusalem and the Judaisers: The Galatian Crisis in its Broader Historical Context.

What are your thoughts on this commentary?
You can contribute your thoughts in our forum.

©2008 Ian Elmer

[Ian's Take Archive]

video.catholica.com.au
This Week's Featured Video

How economic inequality harms societiesHow economic inequality harms societies... We feel instinctively that societies with huge income gaps are somehow going wrong. Richard Wilkinson charts the hard data on economic inequality, and shows what gets worse when rich and poor are too far apart: real effects on health, lifespan, even such basic values as trust. Richard Wilkinson, is Professor Emeritus of Social Epidemiology at the University of Nottingham, and cofounder of The Equality Trust, a nonprofit that aims to reduce income inequality by educating and engaging the public while supporting political commitment to address the problem. 16m55s [String on the Catholica Forum where the general issue of wealth inequality and this documentary was first discussed 25Jan12] | [WATCH THE VIDEO]

Doco 035: 25Jan12Documentary Index

Forum Index Page
Call for Submissions for the Anthology of Spiritual Direction
Thank you for visiting Catholica

This site was developed and is maintained by
Vias Tuas Communications
www.viastuas.net.au
Click HERE to email the Webmaster