Home
Subscribe
Go to Our Forum – the heart of Catholica
Index of Emails
Pray-As-You-Go Daily Meditation
About Us
Contact Us
Donate to Catholica
Advertise With Us
Index of Advertisements
Forum Guidelines
Index of Lead Commentaries
Index of News Stories
Index of Editorials
Index of Multi-Media Commentaries
Catholica Video Channel


Index of all Contributors
Dawn Bowie
Francis Brown
John Chuchman
Fr Patrick Collins
Dr Paul Collins
Brian Coyne
Edgar Davie
Fr Daniel Donovan
Fr Tom Doyle
Fr Peter Dresser
Dr Ian Elmer
Dr Graham English
Vince Exley
Bill Farrelly
Dr Donald Fausel
Dr Brian Gleeson CP
Kerry Gonzales
Daniel Gullotta
Fr Eric Hodgens
Vynette Holliday
Dr Andrew Kania
Gabe Lomas
Dr Anthony Lowes
Milly/Amanda McKenna
Fr John McKinnon
Tom McMahon
Fr Kevin Murphy
Vinnie Nauheimer
Fr John O'Keefe
Dr Anthony Padovano
Dr Allan Patience
Peregrinus
Bishop Pat Power
George Ripon
Holy Irritant/Tony Robertson
Dr Christine Roussel
Emmy Silvius
Richard Sipe
Prof Len Swidler
Kate's TakeWendy's Take
Dr Dick Westley
Occasional Contributions
Lighter Material & Satire
Cindy the Sacristan
View from the Cloister
Ruth's Take
Farmer Jack & Pope Benny
Index to Special Series
Exit Stories
In-depth Interviews with Catholic Leaders
Dr Peter Tannock
Diarmuid O'Murchu
Bishop Kevin Manning
Michael Morwood
Catholica Conversations
Catholic Education
Tom Lee – First 500 Years
Cardinal Mehony – A Novel
Robert Blair Kaiser
Seven Deadlies
Special Editions
Spirituality of Thomas Merton
Sunday Reflections
Sunday Forum
Bishop Geoffrey Robinson
Youth Perspectives
Y-not Question the Sunday Readings
Catholica YouTube Channel
OnLine Catholics Archives
Catholics for Ministry
ABC Religion & Ethics Newsletter

www.google.com


Catholica Web
Spiritual Marketplace
The Magic Pudding

GOOGLE ADVERTISING
Catholica does not necessarily endorse these advertisers. Please use appropriate caution and notify us of inappropriate ads.

DONATE NOW!

Spirituality for Adults

Email a friend Email this page to a friend

Print Print friendly view

Comment Post your feedback in our forum

Fr Daniel Donovan

 

"Re-Inventing the Wheel: Vatican and Receiving Eucharist" Part 2 by Fr Daniel Donovan

Concluding his commentary from yesterday Fr Daniel Donovan today offers a quick overview of how Eucharist was celebrated in the early Church and the insights discerned by the Bishops at the Second Vatican Council. Fr Donovan offers these insights as a counter to the seeming determination of some to overturn those insights and take us back to some form of Jansenism.

Link to Part I

From Frequent Communion to Frequent Confession...

In the early Church the Eucharist was not celebrated daily as is the custom in the western Catholic tradition today. For early Christians there was a close connection between the Lord's Day (Sunday) and the participation in the Lord's Supper. St Justin Martyr[8] (103-165) records that on the Lord's Day, the Christian community gathered and he describes a structure of celebration much like the present day Mass.

Icon of Justin Martyr

WikipediaIcon of St Justin Martyr.

  • The community gathered.
  • There were readings from the Scriptures and the "memoirs of the Apostles" or Gospels.
  • Then the president exhorted the people to apply the readings to their lives.
  • There were prayers of intercession for the Church and the needs of all.
  • Bread and wine are brought forward, (take).
  • The president leads the community in the Eucharistic Prayer. All say Amen (bless).
  • All shared in the sacrifice "the Eucharist is distributed, everyone present communicates and the deacons take it to those who are absent", (break and receive).
  • A collection of goods and money was left with the president "who uses it to help the orphans and widows and all who for any reason are in distress whether because they are sick, in prison, or away from home. In a word, he takes care of all who are in need." Through the collection, those who are the body of Christ expressed their identity ministering to Jesus in his broken body, "the least" (Mt 25:45). This is true veneration, the community recognised the risen Lord and serves him in each other (Mk 10: 45: Lk 22: 23-27; Jn 13: 12-15). This is the enduring mystery of the Eucharist that those who celebrate must live the mystery and become Eucharist to and for each other. In obedient faith, the community gathers, celebrates and lives in memory of Jesus until he comes again.

Gradually, the practice of frequent communion yielded to frequent confession due to the influence of the Irish Missionaries in Europe in the eighth century. Public penance was only able to be received once in the person's lifetime but the Irish form was repeatable. Lateran IV legislated the latter repeatable form of penance to precede the yearly Easter duty. Paul Feider details the shift of the Mass from "community action" to "priestly function" which was a major factor in the decline of frequent communion and the perceived link between penance and Eucharist. Frequent communion was for the clergy but penance was for the people!

During the Dark Ages (eighth through the eleventh century) the private character of the Mass began influencing community Eucharists. We see in the old missals the Mass prayers changed from the use of "we" to "I," and gradually almost all prayers were said silently by the priest alone. By the end of this period of history, the Mass was no longer celebrated consciously as an action of the community, but had become the personal function of the priest.[9]

Adoration of the Eucharistic Lord replaced participation and except for the yearly duty, the people did not receive communion. The actions of Jesus "taking, blessing, breaking and giving" were identified with the priest's actions: the Offertory (taking), the consecration (blessing) and the priest's communion (breaking and receiving). The communion of the people only happened after the priest had bestowed an absolution (not for serious sin) and employed a prayer not of identity but preservation[10]. Frequent confession replaced frequent communion so that by the time of the Council of Trent (1545-1563) people were required to confess "serious sins" according to number and kind in order to obtain absolution.

Sacraments are for the People...

Cardinal Antonio Canizares Llovera

WikipediaCardinal Antonio Canizares Llovera, the Vatican official responsible for this matter.

Prior to Vatican II the sacraments were taught as part of moral theology and many of the present prefects of the various Roman Congregations are products of this legal approach to the sacraments. Yet even in those days there were Latin dictums which distilled the insight of the Church. One such dictum was "sacramenta propter homines", or the "sacraments are for people". In the twenty- first century Church leaders are experiencing a "collective amnesia" having abandoned the vision of Vatican II there is a disorientation which is a wistful longing for the past.

The Australian correspondent lacks any theology of symbol and fails to appreciate the "propter homines" purpose of the sacraments, far from being a liturgical time capsule or even a form of catechesis, is relationship between the community and their God. Through the incarnation, God's son assumed human nature so that WE might share God's natur . Through the sacraments we encounter the risen Jesus and are transformed in his Spirit. Early Christians were forbidden to kneel on the Lord's Day but were required to stand and to pray with their arms outstretched. Remembering is the heart of the Judeo-Christian faith but "to remember" is much more than "thinking about or recalling the past event" rather it is to experience here and now God's saving work and be transformed by God's future, "I-shall-be-that-I-shall-be" (Exodus 3:14)[11] which even now shapes the course of history.

A final request that the high Vatican officials (Cardinals Burke and Llovera) and Anglicans "coming home to Rome or crossing the Tiber" or whatever, please leave the "infuriated modernist" alone so that with Elijah, he or she might attend to God in the "gentle breeze" [1 Kings 19:9a, 11-13a]? Ultimately, God is in that silence not in the external practices which are more consistent with medieval courts than Catholic ritual, no matter how well intentioned!

Fr Daniel Donovan
08 Aug 2011

“In the twenty- first century Church leaders are experiencing a "collective amnesia" having abandoned the vision of Vatican II there is a disorientation which is a wistful longing for the past.” ...Daniel Donovan

LINKS:
Tess Livingstone's report in The Australian:
www.theaustralian.com.au/news/vatican-call-to-formalise-communion-ritual/story-e6frg6n6-1226107759452
PHOTO CREDITS:
The graphic incorporated into today's headline was sourced from the Milk & Honey blogspot. Clicking on the other graphics will take you to the original source.
FOOTNOTES:
[8] Justin Martyr, Op. Cit.
[9] Paul Feider (1986), The Sacraments: Encountering the Risen Lord, Notre Dame, IN: Ave Maria Press, p.42.
[10] "May the body of Our Lord Jesus Christ preserve thy soul to life everlasting Amen." The communicant was passive with the priest praying the whole prayer. The body of the Lord was a spiritual remedy against sin rather than the person's identity as the body of Christ. Maybe this formula with its emphasis on "preserving the soul to life everlasting" suggests the Church's discomfort with Augustine's (354-430) teaching on original sin and the resulting in "fallen human nature" as well as the influence of Pope Gregory VII (540-604) who stressed that "all sexual desire is sinful."
[11] While the Hebrew phrase Ehyeh asher ehyer with "ehyeh" the first person singular imperfect form of "hayah" meaning "existed" or 'was;" while this text (Exodus 3:14) is usually translated as "I am who am," it equally permits of "I-shall-be-that-I-shall-be.Verb tenses in Hebrew "denote action, not time: the perfect tense denotes completed action, and the imperfect (as in Exodus 3:14) denotes incomplete action." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_AM_that_I_Am Reference #1. "Ehyeh" is used 43 times in the Hebrew Scriptures and usually has the meaning "I will be..." (Gen 26:3: Zec 8:8 for example).
Jurgen Moltmann, (1967), Theology of Hope: On the Ground and Implications of a Christian Eschatology, London U.K.: SCM Press, favours this translation of the Exodus 3:14 text and demonstrates that the people of Israel experienced God's fidelity in their history. The people would continue to experience God's fidelity in their day as their fathers and mothers had experienced it in earlier days.

Fr Daniel DonovanFr Daniel Donovan is a priest of the Archdiocese of Sydney NSW. He holds degrees in Theology and Education. He has worked in parishes in Australia and the United States. He has worked in teacher formation programs teaching theology and Religious education at University level. He is involved with religious programs on National Television and Radio networks. He continues to pursue his pastoral and academic interests through retreats, lecturing and conference work especially in aspects of spirituality and faith development.

What are your thoughts on this commentary?
You can contribute to the discussion in our forum.

©2011 Fr Daniel Donovan

Share |

[Index of Commentaries by Dan Donovan]

video.catholica.com.au
This Week's Featured Video

Michael Morwood: "The Challenge in Resurrecting Jesus in Society Today"Michael Morwood: "The Challenge in Resurrecting Jesus in Society Today" In this address given to WATAC (Women and the Australian Church) members on 26th March 2013, Michael Morwood outlines the challenges he sees the Church facing in the years ahead. This address was given in the theatrette of the NSW Parliament at a meeting to celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Second Vatican Council. 33m 34s [Commentary on the Catholica where this address was published on 29Mar2013] | [WATCH THE VIDEO]

Reports 028: 29Mar2013Reports Index

Forum Index Page
Visit the revamped website of the Australian e-Journal of Theology
Thank you for visiting Catholica

This site was developed and is maintained by
Vias Tuas Communications
www.viastuas.net.au
Click HERE to email the Webmaster