Home
Subscribe
Go to Our Forum – the heart of Catholica
Index of Emails
Pray-As-You-Go Daily Meditation
About Us
Contact Us
Donate to Catholica
Advertise With Us
Index of Advertisements
Forum Guidelines
Index of Lead Commentaries
Index of News Stories
Index of Editorials
Index of Multi-Media Commentaries
Catholica Video Channel


Index of all Contributors
Dawn Bowie
Francis Brown
John Chuchman
Fr Patrick Collins
Dr Paul Collins
Brian Coyne
Edgar Davie
Fr Daniel Donovan
Fr Tom Doyle
Fr Peter Dresser
Dr Ian Elmer
Dr Graham English
Vince Exley
Bill Farrelly
Dr Donald Fausel
Dr Brian Gleeson CP
Kerry Gonzales
Daniel Gullotta
Fr Eric Hodgens
Vynette Holliday
Dr Andrew Kania
Gabe Lomas
Dr Anthony Lowes
Milly/Amanda McKenna
Fr John McKinnon
Tom McMahon
Fr Kevin Murphy
Vinnie Nauheimer
Fr John O'Keefe
Dr Anthony Padovano
Dr Allan Patience
Peregrinus
Bishop Pat Power
George Ripon
Holy Irritant/Tony Robertson
Dr Christine Roussel
Emmy Silvius
Richard Sipe
Prof Len Swidler
Kate's TakeWendy's Take
Dr Dick Westley
Occasional Contributions
Lighter Material & Satire
Cindy the Sacristan
View from the Cloister
Ruth's Take
Farmer Jack & Pope Benny
Index to Special Series
Exit Stories
In-depth Interviews with Catholic Leaders
Dr Peter Tannock
Diarmuid O'Murchu
Bishop Kevin Manning
Michael Morwood
Catholica Conversations
Catholic Education
Tom Lee – First 500 Years
Cardinal Mehony – A Novel
Robert Blair Kaiser
Seven Deadlies
Special Editions
Spirituality of Thomas Merton
Sunday Reflections
Sunday Forum
Bishop Geoffrey Robinson
Youth Perspectives
Y-not Question the Sunday Readings
Catholica YouTube Channel
OnLine Catholics Archives
Catholics for Ministry
ABC Religion & Ethics Newsletter

www.google.com


Catholica Web
Spiritual Marketplace
The Liturgical Year

GOOGLE ADVERTISING
Catholica does not necessarily endorse these advertisers. Please use appropriate caution and notify us of inappropriate ads.

DONATE NOW!

Spirituality for Adults

Email a friend Email this page to a friend

Print Print friendly view

Comment Post your feedback in our forum

Dr Brian Gleeson CP
The Jewish World of Jesus by Dr Brian Gleeson CP Part III

ARTICLE NAVIGATION: Part I | Part II | Part III (You are presently reading Part III)

Dr Brian Gleeson today concludes his three-part exploration of the Jewish world in which the historical Jesus lived. As he suggests at the end, we've learned a lot from scholarly study in recent decades but there is still much which we will probably never know. What we have been learning from modern scholarship, Dr Gleeson suggests, "is essential" to any investigation of Jesus' mission, ministry, destiny and identity.

THE ORDINARY PEOPLE...

CrossWho were they?

Most Jews of the time of Jesus were not members of special groups, parties and movements, but the ordinary, uninfluential people who make up the bulk of any country at any time. Most of the population were peasants, living in small villages and coaxing a living from the unpromising soil covering most of Palestine. Shepherds, descendants of nomads, were still numerous. They were often branded by the general population as thieves and untrustworthy. The fishermen of Galilee, from whom Jesus selected several of his disciples, were relatively prosperous. They owned boats and had access to the rich fisheries of the lake. There were a few sizable cities such as Jerusalem, the heavily Gentile Tiberias on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, and Sepphoris, only four miles from Nazareth (though not mentioned in the gospels), and coastal cities such as Caesarea Maritima, Tyre and Sidon. The urban masses of tradespeople, merchants, and the professional classes made their homes in the cities. Some tension existed between the larger cities and the rural villages. Adherence to Jewish religious practice tended to be stricter and more traditional in the smaller and more isolated places of the country.[67]

CrossSocial inequality

The status of women at the time of Jesus was not high. They lived in a patriarchal structure and were not greatly respected. Widows were particularly vulnerable. Some were driven by poverty into prostitution.[68] Male dominance was taken for granted. Marriage laws and customs, divorce, property rights and inheritances all favoured men over women. Marriages were generally arranged. A man could divorce his wife, but generally speaking a woman could not divorce her husband. Men participated in civic life, but the place of a woman was in the home, although this often included helping with the crops.[69]

We meet many women in the gospel stories of the activity of Jesus and of his openness to them:

Their presence in the gospel stories, especially at the high points in the narrative such as Jesus' death and resurrection, is all the more noteworthy if, as many scholars believe, the early church became less open to women's full participation as years and decades passed.[70]

CrossTheir economic burdens

Quarman Cave Four

The books mentioned by Dr Gleeson in this series of articles are availablefrom a number of distributors in the Catholica Marketplace.

Economic problems compounded political tensions. The burden of taxation, especially on the peasants, was almost unbearable. A tithe (10%) was demanded of every male Jew for the upkeep of the temple and its worship. Then there were the relentless demands of Roman taxes with a system open to abuse. Hired Jewish agents were given a quota to fill, and they were practically free to levy taxes as they saw fit. Taxation on Galilean peasants may have gone as high as 40%. Tax collectors were understandably despised as thieves and traitors.[71] So they also bore the brunt of anti-Roman anger, in Judea especially. Jesus seems to have recognised their very vulnerable situation by reaching out to them. The impact of his ministry to Zacchaeus, a chief tax collector, is summed up in the assurance Zacchaeus gives Jesus in Lk 19:8 that he will make things right with those he has wronged, and with the response of Jesus, 'Today salvation has come to this house…'! (Lk 19:9).

Much land was in the hands of absentee land owners, and so there was little opportunity to redress injustice and little incentive for the peasants to work hard on the lands of their absentee landlords.[72] Their economic burdens forced many peasants into slavery.[73] Jesus recognised their plight in his parables about unlucky tenant farmers, day labourers in vineyards, absentee landlords, and unscrupulous middlemen. Such parables were true to the realities of life and were anything but pious platitudes.[74]

Yoder Neufeld makes this insightful comment on people in the parables of Jesus:

Jesus's parables take on special resonance within this world, a world of unequal wealth and power, of economic vulnerability, of fierce competition, as well as of wily survivors. The sometimes dark humor of the parables reflects the yearnings and sense of injustice that people would have experienced. We should imagine that Jesus' popularity was in no small measure owing to his understanding of the vulnerability and everyday suffering of "little people" and of his care for their everyday welfare, illustrated in the gospel accounts by his feeding of the multitudes (e.g., Mark 6/John 6) and by his challenge to the rich to give their wealth to the needy (Matt.19-16-22//Mark 10:17-22//Luke 18:18-23).[75]

CrossTheir burden of religious guilt

To the oppressive political tensions and economic problems must be added the burden of religious guilt. It was impossible for most people to practise the fidelity to the Law required by the Pharisees. Those whose occupations brought them into contact with Gentiles were labelled as officially unclean or incapable of keeping the Law. They included shopkeepers, toll collectors, and traders. Shepherds bore the stigma of suspicion that they were dishonest, like the gypsies of modern Europe. Such proscribed persons were banned from temple worship and from giving testimony in a law court. Of course, such public sinners and outcasts as prostitutes had no hope of achieving the expected standards.[76] This begs the question: Why would Jesus have reached out to them, thereby 'putting a cloud on his reputation'? Yoder Neufeld answers as follows:

Without approving of illicit sexual behaviour, especially of those abusing the women (John 8:3-11), Jesus seems to have been able to provide the kind of respect and acceptance that allowed them to value themselves as daughters of God. The gospels are clear that he was willing to do so at the cost of his reputation among the religious elites.[77]

Complicated rules of purity and exclusion in the time of Jesus are evident in even a casual reading of the gospels. One could become impure or unclean by birth or behaviour, or by eating the wrong kinds of food.[78] One could become impure or unclean through sickness or skin disease (usually referred to as 'leprosy' in the gospels), or by failing to observe the moral requirements of the Law. Those with 'leprosy' had to warn others of their approach with a bell. They became outcasts from the community.[79] In the stories of his meetings with 'lepers' it is worth noting how Jesus deals with them. 'He gets close to them, he touches them, eats with them, and he addresses them with respect (e.g. Matt.8:2-4 // Mark 1:40-44; Matt.26:6 // Mark 14:3; Luke 17:12-19). Jesus's behaviour would have shocked both lepers and those who avoided them.'[80]

A woman during her period was considered unclean. Purity was associated with wholeness, while disabilities such as blindness were associated with sin (see John 9:2). Those born out of wedlock were also considered impure.[81] Many of the ordinary citizens of Israel, then, those known as the amharetz or 'people of the land', found themselves unacceptable and on the outer with the religious establishment. Their way to religious fidelity was permanently barred.[82] The rules of purity, then, resulted in the marginalization of whole classes of people.[83]

CONCLUSION...

At the time of Jesus, the people of Palestine were caught up in intense religious, political, and social ferment. 'Many were pushed to the margins of society, either because of extreme poverty or because of debilitating and ostracizing illnesses of a physical and spiritual nature.'[84] What the Jews had in common was their belief in one God, their conviction that their God had entered into a covenant with them, that God expected them to respond to this by obedience to his Law or Torah, and that God had given their land to Abraham and his descendants.[85] So some 'struggled mightily to practice fidelity to the will of God as expressed in the Torah and sometimes fell victim to the vices that easily upset the virtuous, namely, intolerance and hypocrisy.'[86] Many had an intense desire that God would bring about his kingdom or reign, that God would send a new David, a messiah, to set things right.[87]

But what particularly united Judaism as the religion of the nation was a common religious heritage and a more-or-less common set of scriptures. Beyond the beliefs that united the Jewish people, however, there was much diversity within Judaism. Indeed there were various ways of being a religious Jew. One could be a Pharisee, a Sadducee, an Essene, a Samaritan, or a Christian, and maybe many other things as well.[88]

Thus the world of Jesus was a Jewish world, but in contact with both Greek and Roman cultures. An educated religious Jew might well be trilingual, fluent not only in his native Aramaic and Hebrew, the traditional religious language, but able to carry on business in Greek, the language of the empire. His world was also one of deep religious conviction, but where dissent was generally tolerated. It was also a world of rising political tension, a world that seemed to be moving towards an inevitable holocaust.[89]

Our overview of the world of Jesus, to the extent that it has been recorded in one form or another, is now relatively complete. New discoveries are being made all the time which will gradually fill out our picture, but it is unlikely that we will ever know everything that we want to know.

This was the world to which Jesus was sent and the world to which he ministered. To know his world it is to know the context in which he lived and worked, and something more about his personal identity. Daniel Harrington makes some valuable comments on the context in which Jesus found himself:

Where does Jesus fit on this map of Jewish groups and movements? On the one hand, Jesus has been described as a "marginal Jew" in a book of the same name by John P. Meier on the grounds that he defies any specific categorization [See the current featured video lecture by John P Meier on the Catholica Video Channel LINK]. On the other hand the scholar N.T. Wright portrays him in Jesus and the Victory of God as the incarnation of his people Israel and all its hopes.

We can say with some confidence that Jesus lived as an observant Jew; his quarrel was with the traditions attached to the Law. We can also say that among the various Jewish groups he was closest to the Pharisees in that they shared interest in such topics as resurrection, Sabbath observance and the relative importance of ritual purity and entered into debate with them. What is beyond any doubt is that Jesus had some connection with the movement begun by John the Baptist.[90]

This background of his Jewish world is essential to any investigation of his mission, ministry, destiny and identity.

ARTICLE NAVIGATION: Part I | Part II | Part III (You are presently reading Part III)

“We can say with some confidence that Jesus lived as an observant Jew; his quarrel was with the traditions attached to the Law. We can also say that among the various Jewish groups he was closest to the Pharisees in that they shared interest in such topics as resurrection, Sabbath observance and the relative importance of ritual purity and entered into debate with them. What is beyond any doubt is that Jesus had some connection with the movement begun by John the Baptist.” ...Daniel Harrington quoted by Brian Gleeson

FOOTNOTES:
[67] Cf. Senior, ibid., 44.
[68] Yoder Neufeld, Recovering Jesus, 96.
[69] Rausch, Who is Jesus? 56.
[70] Yoder Neufeld, Recovering Jesus,97. See the excellent collection of gospel illustrations of the attitude and behaviour of Jesus towards women, and of their attachment to him, in Yoder Neufeld (ibid).
[71] Senior, Jesus: A Gospel Portrait, 44.
[72] Cf. Senior, Jesus: A Gospel Portrait, 44.
[73] Rausch, Who is Jesus? 57.
[74] Rausch, ibid.
[75] Yoder Neufeld, Recovering Jesus, 96.
[76] Cf. Senior, Jesus: A Gospel Portrait, 45.
[77] Yoder Neufeld, Recovering Jesus, 98.
[78] Cf. Senior, Jesus: A Gospel Portrait, 45.
[79] Rausch, Who is Jesus? 56.
[80] Yoder Neufeld, Recovering Jesus, 99.
[81] Rausch, Who is Jesus? 56.
[82] Cf. Senior, Jesus: A Gospel Portrait, 45.
[83] Rausch, Who is Jesus? 56.
[84] Yoder Neufeld, Recovering Jesus, 100.
[85] Harrington, Who is Jesus? 7.
[86] Yoder Neufeld, Recovering Jesus, 100.
[87] Yoder Neufeld, ibid.
[88] Harrington,Who is Jesus? 8.
[89] Senior, Jesus: A Gospel Portrait, 45.
[90] Harrington, Jesus: A Historical Portrait, 17.

IMAGE CREDITS:
The image of Jesus used in the header and footer has been sourced from calabresed.tripod.com/jesus/gesucat.jpg.

Brian Gleeson

Dr Brian Gleeson CPDr Brian Gleeson, a Passionist priest, lectures in systematic theology at the Yarra Theological Union in Melbourne. He recently stepped down as the Head of the Department of Church History and Systematic Theology at YTU. He joined the faculty at the beginning of 2001. His previous appointments were at Catholic Theological College Adelaide (2 years); St Paul's National Seminary Sydney (13 years); Catholic Theological Union Sydney (8 years); Pius XII Regional Seminary, Brisbane (1 year); and Good Samaritan Teachers' College, Sydney (4 years). His postgraduate studies were with the Catholic University of Louvain, Belgium; the Gregorian University, Rome; and the Melbourne College of Divinity. Fr Gleeson is also an active member of ACTA (Australian Catholic Theologians' Association).

What are your thoughts on this commentary?
You can contribute to the discussion in our forum.

©2010Dr Brian Gleeson CP

Share |

[Index of Commentaries by Brian Gleeson]

video.catholica.com.au
This Week's Featured Video

Michael Morwood: "The Challenge in Resurrecting Jesus in Society Today"Michael Morwood: "The Challenge in Resurrecting Jesus in Society Today" In this address given to WATAC (Women and the Australian Church) members on 26th March 2013, Michael Morwood outlines the challenges he sees the Church facing in the years ahead. This address was given in the theatrette of the NSW Parliament at a meeting to celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Second Vatican Council. 33m 34s [Commentary on the Catholica where this address was published on 29Mar2013] | [WATCH THE VIDEO]

Reports 028: 29Mar2013Reports Index

Forum Index Page
Broken Rites helps victims of church-related sexual abuse!
Thank you for visiting Catholica

This site was developed and is maintained by
Vias Tuas Communications
www.viastuas.net.au
Click HERE to email the Webmaster