Every inch a prophet: Birthday of John the Baptist (Y-not question the Sunday Readings)
![[image]](http://www.catholica.com.au/sunday/images/Y-not_an_640x166.gif)
Solemnity of the Birthday of John the Baptist
June 24, 2012
Reading I: Isaiah 49:1-6
Responsorial Psalm: 139:1b-3, 13-14ab, 14c-15
Reading II: Acts 13:22-26
Gospel: Luke 1:57-66, 80
"You shall name him John"
The name means “Yahweh has shown favor” - indicating John’s role in salvation history.
When the time arrived for Elizabeth to have her child she gave birth to a son. Her neighbors and relatives heard that the Lord had shown his great mercy toward her, and they rejoiced with her. When they came on the eighth day to circumcise the child, they were going to call him Zechariah after his father, but his mother said in reply, “No. He will be called John.” But they answered her, “There is no one among your relatives who has this name.” So they made signs, asking his father what he wished him to be called. He asked for a tablet and wrote, “John is his name,” and all were amazed. Immediately his mouth was opened, his tongue freed, and he spoke blessing God. Then fear came upon all their neighbors, and all these matters were discussed throughout the hill country of Judea. All who heard these things took them to heart, saying, “What, then, will this child be?” For surely the hand of the Lord was with him.
The neighbours and relatives get a good run in this story, the opening of Luke's gospel, and I wonder if this is his way of saying that he tapped into some lively local and clan memories in doing his research. It is clear from the short introduction to his narrative that Luke had the intention of writing a factual history (see Ch. 1, vs 1-4). The first two footnotes in the New American Bible [NAB] comment on his purpose and the content of his opening chapters.
Then fear came upon all their neighbors, and all these matters were discussed throughout the hill country of Judea. Reading this in the gospel we would realise that Luke is telling us not just that what happened to old Elizabeth was the gossip of the district at the time: I think he is saying that the facts became widely known and discussed, and that people recognised something quite odd, some glimmer of the Mystery in this, and began to ask: "What will this child become?" In other words, the author is already interpreting the historical facts and inviting his readers down the ages to take these matters to heart as the locals did at the time.
The short selection chosen for the liturgy of the day is not sufficient to provide any sort of perspective on this child or on what he might become. It would be a good idea to read the whole of Ch 1, and Ch 3:1-22 as well. (Easy access to the NAB here http://www.usccb.org/bible/luke/1.)
The opening scenario is the simple human situation of an elderly couple, Zechariah and Elizabeth, who were childless. The story begins immediately: Once when he (Zechariah) was serving as priest in his division’s turn before God, according to the practice of the priestly service, he was chosen by lot to enter the sanctuary of the Lord to burn incense. Luke has the proclamation of the Good News begin in the temple, sacred site of old testament worship, custodian of ancient traditions and pride of a resurgent people - the temple in which Jesus will be presented eight days after he is born, where he will engage the learned men in debate at the age of 12, and which he will cleanse with fiery zeal at the climax of his mission. From the moment of his death temple worship will be superceded.
In the announcement of John's birth, notice is given that the old order is to end. If we are inclined to ask why Zechariah should be punished for asking a very natural question, seeing they had been hoping for a baby all their lives, it might help to consider that this old priest stands as a symbol of the whole institution of temple worship. If his fault was to doubt that new life could spring from such an old couple, the Establishment's fault was in its looking backwards to the glorious past, insisting on faithful observance of laws and prescriptions, in the hope of regaining strength and relevance and a leadership role in society. Jesus will declare many times that those leaders were blind to their destiny and deaf to the word calling them to move forward. The parallel with the "hermeneutic of continuity" of today's pope is unavoidable.
Another old man from the temple culture features in Luke's narrative a little later (Lk 2:25-32). Compare the way Simeon looked forward to the fulfillment of ancient promises while Zechariah's backward-looking doubt could only see the obstacles. Being struck dumb, then, is more than a personal punishment for a spontaneous reaction to a surprising prospect. It is a symbol, a myth, whose meaning is that the whole temple priesthood would be punished for having stopped believing and having closed its heart against the ever-active promptings of the Spirit.
The curse is lifted from Zechariah the moment he acknowledges that "John is his name", "John" meaning "God has shown favour". I was wondering why Luke did not give us the meaning of this name, until I realised that the entire Canticle of Zachariah, the "Benedictus", tells how God has shown favour: see verses 67-79. (I don't suppose the gospel writer is saying that Zechariah actually waxed lyrical at that moment, so we ought not take the introductory statement too literally: Then Zechariah his father, filled with the holy Spirit, prophesied, saying: “Blessed be the Lord, the God of Israel, for he has visited and brought redemption to his people...")
On this framework of fact - a child born to an elderly couple, Luke weaves a tapestry of "religious" and "spiritual" themes, many explicit, others hidden in the warp and woof, waiting for the curious reader to ask a Why? or a What is the point of such a remark? Once we take an interest in the way the myths are interwoven we can be endlessly enthralled by the colours and lights revealed as we turn the tapestry this way and that. Over time I have learned to marvel at the inspired skill of those who put these narratives together. It is almost impossible, even today, to declare, let alone describe, a watershed moment of history. Luke manages this formidable task, touching on the broad and deep implications of these events without ever becoming banal or merely factual.
What John did turn out to be is told in chapter 3. He is the embodiment of the Old Testament challenge as he calls the present generation a "brood of vipers", declaring that the "axe is laid to the root" and "every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire." Note that his target is not the ordinary people, for Luke gives a list of such ones who ask him, What should I do? and his answers are both simple common sense advice and compassionate in tone.
John is more than an individual preacher, however remarkable for his single-minded dedication. As the precursor, or the herald, he represents the centuries-long time of preparation for the day of the Lord. When Jesus said John was the greatest, it was more for this role than for his personal faithfulness.
One small question for the very curious: Why would you say a precursor was necessary? Why was someone like John sent to announce the coming of the Saviour? Possibly the reason is to be found in the "rule" that no-one takes on the role of proclaiming a message from God of his own accord. Every prophet is "sent", every leader "commissioned". Always the people have the right to ask: By what authority? John was an "original" after the style of Isaiah and other great prophets. Luke has already drawn this parallel in his opening lines with the angel standing at the right of the altar to deliver his message to Zechariah. Read Chapter 6 of Isaiah to get the connection.
Jesus had no intention of being that sort of prophet or preacher. His was a new way, to mix with people, share their lives and gently help them discover a new awareness of god present in the ordinary, and so by enlightenment to liberate them from the bind of religious formalism. In this Jesus was an object of wonder and doubt, even to his disciples. He was so ordinary - and yet they knew for a fact that John had pointed him out as the one to follow, the one on whom the spirit had come, the one who would wash the world with the Holy Spirit and cleanse it with the Spirit's fire, and John's testimony could be relied on because he was every inch a prophet in whom the voice of God was heard.
Tony Lawless
![]()
'TonyL
"A post is a free gift, and it will go where it pleases."'
Every inch a prophet: Birthday of John the Baptist
Tony, I just love the way you unpack all the symbolism in this story, symbolism I never dreamed was there. It all makes so much sense looked at from this perspective.
After following with great interest the discussions about the interpretation of scripture and what can be taken literally, and what metaphorically, I came to this chapter 1 of Luke, and wondered should I just take it literally, or should I look for a deeper meaning?
And then I remembered somebody saying that when two Jews sit and argue about Torah, if they can't come up with 72 different interpretations, then they are not trying. How on earth do they settle on just one interpretation to live by? Perhaps they don't. Perhaps in the process of mulling over a particular passage, the fullness of meaning is only realized by having all these interpretations rubbing up against each other. Then maybe some start to have a deeper resonance, while others retreat to the edges of the discussion.
Furthermore, what resonates at a gut level for one person, might find no response in another.
This rather suggests that there may be no definitive interpretation underlying a passage - just literal, metaphoric and symbolic interpretations sitting side by side. Or it might not even be an actual meaning, but rather a grand poetic rolling of words, which on the surface seem not to make sense, but nevertheless hint at a mystery that is deeply attractive.
When I turned to the passage about the birth of John the Baptist, it was just a story about the birth of a child who was not given an expected family name. The unusual part of the story was that Zechariah, the father of the child, had lost the power of speech, until he agreed the child should be called John. This was taken as a portent that the child would be someone special, and, as we all know, that is what happened. But does the story have any other purpose than this for being included in the narrative? This is where I really began to appreciate the way you have opened it up and laid out the symbolic meaning of the story of Zechariah, Tony.
On the other hand, you did not expand on Elizabeth's presence, understandably, since the focus is on Zechariah. By the way, did you find anything that resonated particularly for you in his story?
Anyway, I began thinking about Elizabeth. Like Sarah before her, she was past child-bearing age and had been unable to have children. Now she is suddenly pregnant. Then I remembered Mary. A girl not yet married, not in a sexual relationship, and she too becomes pregnant. In all these circumstances we would think that pregnancy would not be possible. When I come to what seems impossible by nature, I often take that as an invitation to shift to a different level of interpretation.
The first question that came up for me then is whether this story is talking about a real, physical pregnancy or not. Perhaps it's talking about a different sort of pregnancy altogether, a pregnancy of the soul, a spiritual pregnancy, where a divine spark strikes the soul, impregnating it. The beginning of a mystical journey. Perhaps a moment similar to that experienced by Jesus when he was baptized by John.
And what of the ensuing pregnancy, and then the pain of labour before the child is born? Perhaps that is a woman's way of talking about a spiritual journey, from that first moment of grace when a small spark ignites the virginal soul, through the dark night of struggle and pain, to the final enlightenment when the spark finally becomes a flame, burning strongly and steadily.
Many years ago I read the spiritual autobiography of Irina Tweedie, a childless, Russian/English widow in her fifties who went to a Sufi teacher in India, wanting him to help her find God. In the course of conversations with him in the first few days, he turned to her thoughtfully at one point and said slowly,
"It takes time to make a soul pregnant with God. But it can be done; IT WILL BE DONE..."
Irina Tweedie. Daughter of Fire; A Diary of a Spiritual Training with a Sufi Master. p.14
To make a soul pregnant with God. Such powerful, powerful words! Reading that passage for the first time set me wondering about the nature of Mary's pregnancy, for surely, hers was a soul pregnant with God. And now Elizabeth's pregnancy, something similar happening.
The meaning of the story that come from this for me, is that any woman can set out on a spiritual journey, whether young or old, whether unmarried or married. It is never too late to begin. No vows of celibacy or sexual abstinence required! And I would think the same for any man too.
But this is to neglect the role of poor old Zechariah. Why was he struck dumb when he questioned Gabriel, but Mary was not when she asked a similar question? The only difference was that he was not the one becoming pregnant, and maybe that was an important difference.
The only other thing that occurred to me, again from reading women's spiritual autobiographies, is that sometimes a husband is not happy when his wife wants to start exploring spiritual questions, mostly because he does not want their life together to change. Perhaps Zechariah was a bit like that - not struck dumb, just sulking, refusing to talk - until he was finally reconciled, liking the changes that came about. But I have to say that this part about Zechariah does not particularly resonate with me, so Tony, I'm happy to sit back and enjoy your unfolding of the symbolism of it all.
As for the child John, he grew and became strong in the spirit, and was in the desert, until the day of his manifestation to Israel. A real desert, or the desert within? Perhaps both, for that is where the mystery of the universe discloses itself, and where John came from as a prophet.
What I have tried to do here is to give a mystical interpretation to these Gospel passages in Luke. It is not a cultural/historical interpretation, it is not a literal one. Nor is it a theological one. All can overlay each other and add richness to the givenness of the words.
Can we expand that richness further? What does this scripture passage mean for others reading this? What other interpretations could be added?
Sue
Every inch a prophet: Birthday of John the Baptist
Sue you made me think of when my soul became “pregnant with God” (I love that phrase!) It was before there was any Catholic charasmatic movement in Brisbane and the first little book had appeared on the bookstore shelves, telling of the experience of those in Ann Arbor in the USA who visited an evangelical charasmatic group and all had experiences of God's presence. I read the book and it answered a need I was feeling at that time to know God before I could really say "I believe in God" and give him my complete trust.
After this experience I felt the need to discuss it with someone who might understand. I had tried to tell a little theological study group we were involved in at the time but no one seemed to appreciate or understand what I had experienced. Then for the first and only time I called an agency to get a baby sitter for the evening. She had been in the house only a few minutes when she said, “You are a charasmatic christian are't you!” I was so taken aback that I replied, “I think I must be,” and told her a little what I had experienced. She then added, “Your husband is too.” He had given me support but I was surprised. Given this encouragement I discussed it more deeply with him as I realised you can not really know the depths of faith of even your nearest and dearest.
Charismatic groups and becoming 'pregnant with God'
PMR, I am so glad you found an echo of that phrase 'pregnant with God' in your own experience with an evangelical charismatic group. Also, I am not surprised that no one in your theological study group seemed to appreciate or understand what you had experienced. You are not alone in this. The spiritual journey, especially after that little spark has struck, is essentially a solitary journey, even though you might find the courage to share it with your nearest and dearest.
Now, I have just assumed that you went to the evangelical charismatic group, but maybe you had only read about them, when the babysitter made her comment. Did you start going regularly to a charismatic group after that? How did you find it? I would be really interested to know.
Like you, when I was a young woman, I felt a need to know God before I could say 'I believe', however I never had the courage to go to such a group as I was afraid of being caught up in something I did not understand. I regret that now, so would love to hear more of your experience.
Sue
Trying to answer Sue's question to PMR about Charismatic groups
Sue asked the question to PMR about her “charismatic experience.” I can’t speak for PMR, however, her phrase, “becoming pregnant with God,” is apt for me, as the way I first encountered God in a real way through the charismatic renewal.
That was on November 30, 1972. I too had read the news coming out of Ann Arbor, Michigan, testifying that something radically new and different was happening among Catholics. At that time I don’t think the work “charismatic” had even been coined yet, and the term used was more likely to have been, Baptism of the Holy Spirit.
Regardless, I attended, at the urging of two of my very fundamentalist Protestant friends, a city-wide Pentecostal gathering at a public school auditorium in Bozeman, Montana. That was on the 1972 date I mentioned.
A Lutheran minister ran the meeting, and it didn’t take me long to realize that he was preaching the exact same message, or news, that I’d been reading about from the Catholics in places like Ann Arbor and Notre Dame. After the Reverend Dornberg finished he invited those who were interested to gather in an unused classroom, where he prayed for each person individually.
With forty years of retrospection I would no longer call it an experience, but a moment! A moment that I can trace back to where my life changed irrevocably. Certainly there have been times when that first “pregnancy” waned, but the new life, which is what pregnancy is, never did. As you can see, if I’m being one tiny bit clear here, this happens to people in many diverse experiences or situations, and to claim it as exclusive to charismatic renewal would be just that, exclusive.
For me, however, at that time it was probably the only thing that would have penetrated my hard shell, because it was REAL. In other words that new life (perhaps “light” is even a better word) has stayed with me. I’m not trying to hawk a book, but I probably described the moment (or experience) better, although esoterically, in my book, Windknocker.
To answer Sue’s question, I attended both Catholic and Protestant charismatic groups for the next fifteen years. I was never totally comfortable with some of the Protestant groups, but in the beginning I felt like the Catholic groups closely resembled what it must have been like to follow the risen Jesus amongst the early Christian communities.
That began to change as the Catholic groups, in their intense desire to be accepted by the Church, allowed themselves to become more mainstream. Some call it co-opted. That’s my opinion of course; the same as it is that the Church never did, or would have, accepted the enthusiasm (the realness) of the early Catholic Charismatic groups.
Thanks again PMR for the pregnancy phrase, as well as the story of your encounter with the babysitter. I too could relate similar experiences.
As one great scribe once said, “If you aren’t confused, you haven’t been paying attention.” But I do hope this gets to some of Sue’s question.
Bud Malby
![]()
Bud Malby
Trying to answer Sue's question to PMR about Charismatic groups
With forty years of retrospection I would no longer call it an experience, but a moment! A moment that I can trace back to where my life changed irrevocably. Certainly there have been times when that first “pregnancy” waned, but the new life, which is what pregnancy is, never did. As you can see, if I’m being one tiny bit clear here, this happens to people in many diverse experiences or situations, and to claim it as exclusive to charismatic renewal would be just that, exclusive.
Being 'pregnant with God' is a sure event as it came to me in childhood ... and the pregnancy delivered a being that was no longer, if ever, disparite to the Divine Being. It is as if the very wonder and subsequent, as if there were time, love, of being divine was a pregnancy that delivered a new Creation. To be aware of it and revel in it is the purpose of our being.
Francis who thanks all for their prayer and care in Mary and my current illness.
![]()
My purpose is to remember the love that created me in God one with my brothers and sisters and with all life. My function is to extend that love and unity each moment to all.
Trying to answer Sue's question to PMR about Charismatic groups
Thanks Francis - that's just the way I feel.
Just a side issue...
Bud, thank you for your very interesting and inspiring recollection of your spiritual journey. However, to give credit where credit is due, it was actually Sue, not PMR, who came up with the phrase, "pregnant with God", although to put it more accurately, she was quoting from a Sufi teacher.
But I agree, it is a phrase that is so evocative and overflowing with meaning, for men as well as women.
![]()
Cathy Taggart
I splash in my poetry puddle
and try to keep God amused. - James Broughton
Trying to answer Sue's question to PMR about Charismatic groups
Marvemlb No I needed to talk my experience over with some who would understand what it meant to me so I arranged to visit the home of my babysitter who was an answer to this prayer. From the beginning I had found that her habit of quoting scripture in every sentence was too evangelical for me but in spite of the different backgrounds I believed her experience of God was as real as was mine and this was enough for me it was what I had asked for though it did come in a person and a way I could hardly have imagined.
I did quite a bit later go along to a few meetings of the Catholic Charismatics which was in its infancy in Brisbane but found they seemed to expect that the spirit could only be passed to others by the laying on of hands and that I could have had this experience without this seemed incomprehesible to them. I must admit that at this time much of my first 20 years of married life were very busy as we had a dozen children over that period so much of my prayer life was what I can only describe as Kitchen Sink Spirituality and prayer,
The catholic movement seemed to become too fundamentalist for me so my development was largely outside this stream. It was and remains very real and this habit of listening to that voice within is still real and still astonishes me at the insights I am given. Shar
Trying to answer Sue's question to PMR about Charismatic groups
Bud, Francis and Shar. Thank you all for responding to my question charismatic groups and spiritual experience. Looks like all three of you have had firsthand experience of the meaning of the word 'metanoia' .... as a particular moment that brought about a permanent reorientation of your lives.
I also appreciated being told why none of you were attracted to being with Catholic or Protestsnt Charismatc groups. As you say, Shar, the Catholic movement did seem to move towards fundamentalism, I suppose in their eagerness for approval by Rome. But I think the Protestant groups may have moved in that direction too, as far as I could tell from limited contact with some evangelical members.
I have been remembering my own contact with members of such groups, and feeling there was a lot of group pressure to conform to their views and not to question their beliefs. I was also uneasy about their readiness and certainty in believing 'messages' that Jesus/the Spirit was telling them to do this or that. It all seemed a bit close to the New Age phenomenon of spirit guides and 'channeling' the voices of such guides. Nevertheless, I do not doubt for one moment that the original metanoia experience was not genuine.
Many thanks for your stories, they help to make Catholica the rich place that it is.
Sue
Pregnant with God
Thank you, Sue, for this marvelous extension and deepening of my thoughts for this occasion. It's a classic example of where a woman can see things a bloke might never think of. So many points to underline:
How on earth do they settle on just one interpretation to live by? Perhaps they don't. Perhaps in the process of mulling over a particular passage, the fullness of meaning is only realized by having all these interpretations rubbing up against each other.
I like that view of the spirit active in so many ways: much as life flourishes in the garden when a good ecology is allowed to develop.
Or it might not even be an actual meaning, but rather a grand poetic rolling of words, which on the surface seem not to make sense, but nevertheless hint at a mystery that is deeply attractive.
Why not? What's wrong with getting a hint of the mystery. We don't always need the cut and dried theological.
By the way, did you find anything that resonated particularly for you in his story?
Well, I suppose the main thing that struck me was that the old order passes away, and I was reminded of Tennyson in Morte d'Arthur (a quote my Sue just loves):
"The old order changeth, giving place to new,
And God fulfils himself in many ways,
Lest one good custom should corrupt the world."
To make a soul pregnant with God. Such powerful, powerful words!
Now there's a thought!
The meaning of the story that comes from this for me, is that any woman can set out on a spiritual journey, whether young or old, whether unmarried or married. It is never too late...
As people are continually discovering for themselves, aye?
What I have tried to do here is to give a mystical interpretation to these Gospel passages in Luke. It is not a cultural/historical interpretation, it is not a literal one. Nor is it a theological one. All can overlay each other and add richness to the givenness of the words.
I like that too. The Lord spreads a mighty banquet...
Thank you, and we look forward to many more comments added to these.
tony
![]()
'TonyL
"A post is a free gift, and it will go where it pleases."'
Every inch a prophet: Birthday of John the Baptist
Thank you, Tony and all.
"What will this child become?"
The question jumped off the screen at me!
A grandchild was born in our family recently and we were filled with great admiration and love for such a beautiful, tiny, vulnerable new child.
Of course we were all wishing him a wonderful life and we will do our utmost to support him.
No doubt our own births were the same.
Every birth can be seen as a gift, a sacred event. We, as sacred gifts ourselves, can reflect on what mark we have left and are leaving on God’s creation during our lifetimes, what our contributions have been.
We can look back over our lives and reflect on our efforts to let the light of Christ into our lives.
Christ was not about violent revolution to bring truth and justice into the world.
He came just like our children and grandchildren – helpless, vulnerable and gentle.
He taught us by example, reaching out to the vulnerable and the marginalised with love.
His life was about self-giving.
So that is why we, every day, in our own tiny ways try to show the faith, the conviction, the strength of spirit to speak and act with courage against injustice and evil in the world.
It is the right thing to do!
Congratulations Jerome!
A grandchild was born in our family recently and we were filled with great admiration and love for such a beautiful, tiny, vulnerable new child.
[quote]
[/quote]
What great news, Jerome! All the best to you, the beautiful child and the new parents.

I can hardly wait until I'm a grandma - but I go into that in my own response to Tony's lead reflection.
![]()
Cathy Taggart
I splash in my poetry puddle
and try to keep God amused. - James Broughton
Nothing brightens up ordinary time like a birthday celebration!
Many thanks, Tony, Sue, PMR and Jerome for your different and very awe-inspiring (I DO mean that literally!) perspectives on this week’s Gospel. As you say, Sue, diverse approaches to Biblical texts really do “overlay each other and add richness to the givenness of the word". So, while my contribution might not be so awe-inspiring, I hope it may nonetheless add to the richness of our understanding.
For a start, I've always loved the way that, when a major feast of the Church falls on a Sunday, the liturgy for the feast day takes precedence over the normal Ordinary Time liturgy. It's like the way a birthday or other special celebration breaks up the monotony of our own ordinary time! And this time the feast is actually a birthday, that of John the Baptist. (Alright, I know he probably wasn’t really born on that date, but that’s beside the point here!) It's strange in one way that he was made a major saint of the Church at all: technically, he wasn't even a Christian! But he was the precursor of Jesus, the link between the old way and the new way of Jesus, as Tony explains. So his birth was the beginning of a new era, or at least, a focal point between the old and the new.
Obviously, in the story of Elizabeth becoming pregnant in her old age, Luke would have intended a parallel with Sarah, who bore Abraham a son when it seemed that she was doomed never to do so. For Abraham, this son was the fulfilment of God’s promise that he would have limitless descendants (cf Gen. 21:12b) For Zechariah, the situation is the opposite: the child is not to bear his name, but a name that has no connection with his family, and he is destined for a role that will mean a complete break with the life which Zechariah and, presumably, his ancestors had lived for generations.
In this context a lot of modern parents could identify with Elizabeth and Zechariah. There are many parents these days, for instance, who are so unshakeably convinced about the rightness of their religious (or other) beliefs, and yet they see their children take a very different path. Or when their young adult offspring go “off the rails” and become lost in the world of drugs, alcohol, maybe even crime so that they end up in jail. In my own case, I have been very blessed in my children, now aged 29 and 25, in that they are two wonderful young people that any parent would be proud of. But right now, the deepest desire of my heart is to have a grandchild. There’s not much sign of it as yet! My daughter even split up with her long-time boyfriend – who I assumed would be the future father of her children – because she had a deep-felt need to spread her wings and experience life as a single adult. She still plans to get married and have children – eventually. Similarly, I think my son and his partner are planning to have children – eventually. Not long ago, I told someone about how I seemed to be having a long wait before becoming a grandma, and she replied, “Make sure you make good use of the waiting time!” Good advice. And waiting, of course, is something that we associate with the adult John the Baptist, as he fulfilled his role as the proclaimer of the long-awaited Messiah.
And waiting–times don’t have to be tedious, there are always birthdays and other celebrations to brighten them up!
![]()
Cathy Taggart
I splash in my poetry puddle
and try to keep God amused. - James Broughton
Nothing brightens up ordinary time like a birthday celebration!
It is wonderful having grandchildren. Morna & I have 21 grandchildren from 25 years old down to 7 years old.
One of the great things with having grandchildren is, that if they playup to much you can send them home to their parents.
May God bless all of our grandchildren still to enter this world.
BarryS
![]()
I live for those that love me
For those that know I am true
For the heaven that smiles above me
& awaits my coming too
For the cause that needs assistance
For the wrong that needs resistance
For the future in the distance
& the good that I can do.
Every inch a prophet: Birthday of John the Baptist
Thanks Tony for your insight of the message within of this narrative. Like you I see it as the result of Luke's research and I see the basic events as historical. The benedictus likewise I see as a Lukan composition which expounds the great mystery of the imminent arrival of Yeshua the messiah promised of old. Such a story becomes a mail bag full of faith beliefs and content of the Good News. You are a breath of fresh air for me. Thanks Beehive
![]()
Brian Pitts
Every inch a prophet: Thank you all
Especially for the window into charismatic spirituality, with people sharing their own experience. I'd like to add a word about my own. I've been to charismatic meetings a few times, respected their way, but found no desire to become part of it. Likewise a close friend over many many years was saved through the help she got in a (non catholic) healing ministry - after shock therapy made her worse, etc. She has flourished in that milieu, still listens to the voice of The Lord sending her to this or that needy person almost on a daily basis, and suffers as much as anyone in her compassionate concern for those who are suffering. The Holy Spirit will not be contained in any box.
Me. I just keep aware, much as I do towards partner Sue, and the kids, and the neighbours, and the two dogs, and the larger family, and Catholica folk. Even when you go for a nap you have to keep alert. If the Spirit has a "message", she'll know how to contact me - and that happens all the time, actually. The most amazing thing at present is in the preparing of these weekly comments on the readings. I focus on them at a certain level all week, and gradually the scene, the topic, the actors, the words all open up, questions come out, links become visible, meanings sometimes show up. Enough to write some sort of a comment that surprisingly others seem to find worth reading.
Thank you to all who offer support in this enterprise. I am often nearly drowning in it, but always thriving. Funny: that sounds a bit like something Paul said, although he was talking about real opposition from heavies inside the Christian communities and outside them. I lead a sheltered existence. What I'm saying is that the Spirit does speak in every heart and welcomes the chance to be heard through our words when we speak or write of our experience. At least, that's what I reckon.
tony
![]()
'TonyL
"A post is a free gift, and it will go where it pleases."'

















