Choosing to get dangerous!
Dear Friends,
It really is fascinating at the moment watching the unfolding religio-spiritual scene around the world. For a long time the characteristic within Catholicism at least seems to have been what might be lablled a "quiet attrition" — slowly, slowly, a few hundred or a few thousand, week in and week out simply "forget to rock up this Sunday". There are no letters of protest or explanation to bishops or the pope. People simple cease turning up to Sunday Mass — or participating in any of the other sacraments. As the pews empty the insecurities of the remnant escalate. The noise they create grows louder and the certitude with which they claim to know the mind of God grows more intense.
The election of Barack Obama as next President of the United States seems to have raised the stakes within conservative Christianity to a new fever pitch if you have been following any of the conservative Catholic news agency reports — or even the mainstream ones for that matter. One could be forgiven for believing that we're approached "end of the world" territory.
I have long predicted there would eventually be a counter reponse to the pattern of recent decades. I think it is now starting to build. In recent weeks I've become aware of a significant development in North America where all the major reform groups in the Church are now pooling their energies to mount a major conference in 2011 (I'll provide further information about this in a separate news report later today on Catholica). In our own forum in the past week, and as far as I can see quite independently of what is happening in North America, Frank Purcell called for a Synod of the Australian Church [LINK]. It has generated some enthusiasm within our community.
In our forum this morning Gail has posted a provocative idea she entitled: "Choosing to get dangerous about 'pro choice'." I read it as another "straw in the wind". People have "had enough". The "quiet exit from the pews" is coming to an end. The attrition that has been going on in the institutional Church is now beginning to slice into a sector of the population who are no longer prepared to leave without leaving any protest notes.
A bishop once explained to me "Brian, I see my role as trying to be a symbol of unity across the factions in the Church. I want to be seen as a bridge across the divisions." It sounds wonderful in theory. What he seemed to fail to understand is that when you have one faction that is totally incapable of listening to what anyone else has to say no one can play the "let's be nice to one another, children" game. The catastrophic exit out of the pews proves that. If you have a faction that is totally incapable of listening to viewpoints other than their own, and you have a weak leadership, or one that actually continually favours the faction that won't listen to anybody else, you eventually end up with a Church that only consists of that faction. Is that not as logical as one of Euclid's geometrical theorems?
Dr Ian Elmer's commentary today looks at leadership and resolving conflicts between factions in the early Church. What he writes is highly relevant to our own time. Don't miss what he has to write. Also don't miss Gail's post on the forum (I warn: prepare to have your brain spun around in its cranial cavity. What she writes is in the realm of "getting dangerous" as she herself warns.) <Link to Ian's commentary>
MEANWHILE, WHAT DO YOU THINK POPE BENEDICT MIGHT BE UP TO? In the news this morning it's reported he's considering another change in the Liturgy for the Eucharist by changing where the Kiss of Peace takes place. Talk about "shuffling the deckchairs on the Titanic"! <Link to Associated Press news report>
|