![]() |
EDITOR'S ROUND-UP Saturday, 24 November 2007 |
|
|
Was Rome really the See of Peter? Dear friends, Plenty to whet your appetite today. Firstly the Forum held at the Camberwell Civic Centre in Melbourne on Thursday night has stirred up a bit of a hornet's nest on various blogs and discussion boards. You can get the gist of what's happened via some posts and links I've placed on our discussion board. <Read the posts on our forum> Today's lead commentary: Continuing on from his commentary last week examining the origins of the Church in Rome, Dr Ian Elmer explores the connections between Rome as the See of Peter, and the notion that the Bishop of Rome can claim to be Peter's successor. Both of these notions are the sort of issues that John Paul II indicated as stumbling blocks in the path towards greater ecumenical co-operation, if not reunification. <Read Ian's commentary> Petition Update... The petition has now closed and will be presented to the Bishops next week. Their Plenary meeting starts on Monday. We will publish the grand total when we have a final figure. The progressive figure we published yesterday as 16,583 but Paul Collins has sent me an email a while ago saying the total he had was 16,522. Either way it is an impressive effort although one suspects some people will never be pleased — the fact that 85% of the faithful have already walked out still doesn't seem to have made an impression on them and they seem intent on getting the numbers up to 90 or 95%! |
AND FOR OUR WEEKLY READERS HERE ARE OUR COMMENTARIES FROM THE PAST WEEK... |
||||||||||||
|
|
Best wishes for a great day wherever you happen to be ... in life, and in
our world, Catholica Australia |
|