 |
Dear friends,
It seems to me that whatever the future holds there are likely
to be three major changes that will mark the social climate within
which the Church of the future conducts its mission. The current
edition of National Catholic Reporter
contains articles related to two of them.
In my own comment today I don't want so much to discuss these
matters in detail but to explore with you, the readers of Catholica,
the possibility of drawing up some kind of list of major issues
or challenges that might mark the way the Church conducts its mission
in the future. I'm suggesting, of course, that we might consider
this in an optimistic framework which assumes that the institution
is able to address the single most significant challenge facing
it at the moment — the decline in sacramental participation
by its ordinary members.
Such a list might form some kind of basis that helps us focus on
the sorts of issues we might most profitably be discussing in the
pages of Catholica. It
might provide some kind of guide both to our lead commentators as
well as contributors to the forums.
The
two issues that caught my eye in NCR
this week is first the
editorial, and the
lead article by Joe Feuerherd, on the issues of accountability
that are opening up for the institution. The NCR
articles this week are principally dealing with financial accountability
but in recent days in Catholica, myself and other writers, have
made more than passing reference to the changing nature of the sorts
of accountability our spiritual leaders will have to adapt to. In
Australia the major proportion of Church income today comes from
government sources rather than the collection bowl on Sundays. The
institution has already faced subtle forms of change in the way
it conducts its mission because of the accountability requirements
imposed by public funding. I have raised the prospect that our spiritual
leaders are going to have to become more accountable to the broad
membership of the Church as to how moral law and theological insight
is interpreted if the leadership are to retain the confidence of
their flock. Perceptions are changing rapidly now and people seem
to be coming to the view that God speaks to us through the whole
of the human family and the responsibility of our spiritual leaders
is a collaborative one of endeavouring to discern what God is saying
to us through this diverse channel rather than an older theology
where we, and they, believed God seemed to speak through some exclusive
"royal telephone" to His Holiness or the assembled bishops
alone. Our perception of God is changing and how God intersects
with the human family.
Sr
Joan Chittister, in her
weekly column, raises another interesting point for discussion.
This is the changing relationship of religion to the State. I won't
steal her thunder but I do highly recommend that all thinking Catholics
ought to at least make themselves familiar with the issues she raises
this week in her column.
The third issue that I would
add to this list of major challenges facing the institution concerns
the changing ways in which we interact socially. I suspect that
a significant factor in the drop-off in participation at Sunday
Mass does not actually come from any negatives to do with Church,
it simply comes from the changing nature of our lives socially.
We have less reason to move outside our homes today, apart from
work — and, in Australia, researchers tell us we're working
longer hours than we have ever worked before. When we get home on
the weekend we tend to stay there, playing with all our gadgets,
or being entertained or informed by information delivered directly
into our homes rather than us having to go out and retrieve it from
other places in our environment. I honestly believe we are going
to be forced to find new ways of encouraging "sacramental participation,
communion, and communio". This is going to be very uncomfortable
for some who believe our membership of the institution is actually
defined by our fronting up to Mass on Sundays. In the future will
the institution be able to even provide sufficient priests to ensure
Mass can be celebrated universally for all? That question itself
may end up being the one that ultimately forces the issues of married
clergy but I am suggesting that even with that concession it might
not be enough given the changing social and work climate we operate
in. Perhaps a question we need to be considering is a completely
new understanding of how we "keep holy the Sabbath day"
or celebrate the time of Sabbath in our lives.
So here's my three big issues to kick the list off.
- How will the changing rules, and direction, of accountability
change our core understanding of being Church or being "the
Body of Christ"?
- How will the changing relationship of religion to the secular
State change our core understanding of being Church or being "the
Body of Christ"?
- How, or will, the changing ways in which we interact
as social beings affect our understanding of the nature of participation
in forming "the Body of Christ"? How will we live out
the Third Commandment?
What other major issues do you think we
collectively face in the ways in which we "make Church, be
Church, celebrate our Communion as the Body of Christ, and keep
alive the remembrance that we are asked to keep central to the core
of our collective and individual faith journeys"?
Best wishes for a great day wherever you happen to be ... in life,
and in our world,
Brian Coyne
Editor and Publisher
Catholica Australia
Catholica Australia
34 Martin Place, LINDEN NSW 2778, Australia
tel: +612 4753 1226 | skype name: briancoyne | mobile: 0423 793
494
email: editor@catholica.com.au
|