|
Protecting the Eastern Lung within the Catholic Church
If we are to accept the teachings of the Greek Fathers of the Church
that, "there is, between human persons,
a legitimate, God-created and mutually enriching diversity which has its
roots in the Trinity itself" then in this essay I
wish to impart the necessity of protecting the Eastern Lung within the
Catholic Church, as well as the critical need to evangelize Catholics
of all Rites as to an awareness of the universality of the Church. (Meyendorff,
1983, p. 24) It is critical that the considerable
harm that has been done to the Eastern Catholic Churches, by the Latin
Church, are redressed, in order that the separated Eastern brothers and
sisters, may see that they are desired by the Catholic Church, not so
as to be subsumed, but to be cherished for the unique expression of the
Holy Spirit that resides within Them.
I impress upon the reader, especially my Latin Church brothers and sisters,
that this paper is written free of invective, but is a statement of facts
to be considered, and reflected upon. I write in full support of the Church
Universal, yet all the while critical of some of the tragic acts that
have comprised Her history. It is useless for the evolution of the Catholic
Church that the wrongs of the past be ignored, in the faint hope that
political correctness in some way will redress these issues and wounds
in the future. If we do not learn from history, George Santayana explains,
we are doomed to at some later stage, to repeat the mistakes. In the case
of the Catholic Church, such a repetition of history would undoubtedly
lead to further schism, and greater delays in East/West reconciliation.
The reader must also counterbalance in their minds, all the while, the
many wonderful charisms of the Latin Church that exist alongside this
critique, for nothing is gained by bad conscience but only by constructive
introspection: "for it belongs to the very
essence of catholicity to share in the brother's problems and to help
him in resolving them". (Meyendorff,
1983, p.77) I write in the hope that my words can enrich both the
Eastern and Western Churches in becoming aware of and fulfilling each
of their identities. Living in the modern world, let us also seek to have
a modern marriage between East and West, one based not on servitude, but
on equality and mutual respect.
One should also keep in mind the many great contributions made in Australia
of Roman Rite priests who have come to the much needed aid of the Ukrainian
Church, especially so after the period of Soviet persecution men
such as: the former Chancellor of the Eparchy, Fr. John Bowden CSsR
(whose Cause for Canonization is now being put forward by the Ukrainian
Church in Australia); Archimandrite Peter Guy MSC, and Fr. Laurie
Foote O.P. All these men devoted many, if not the majority of their
priestly lives to the Eastern Catholic Churches. Interestingly, Fr. Foote
would write to The Liturgical Commission in 2005: "When I was
Ukrainian parish priest in Adelaide in the late 90's, more than once I
received Confirmation notifications for children baptized and already
confirmed/ chrismated in our Church. What amazed me a bit was the fact
that each child has to present a baptism certificate to the school before
being accepted for Confirmation. It would appear that many teachers were
not bothering to read the certificates, which are printed very clearly
in both Ukrainian and English." (www.litcom.net.au,
29th of May, 2005).
The question of married clergy
Moreover, although defending the Eastern Churches right to a married
clergy this essay should not be deemed as a call for a likewise
change of clerical discipline in the West. It is overly simplistic to
wish to introduce a married clergy in the West by way of arguing of its
existence in the East. The East has a separate theology on which the discipline
of a married clergy is based, as distinct from a well-established theological
tradition in the West that has supported the priestly charism of celibacy.
As an Eastern Catholic academic, I have sought in this paper to respond
to the late Pontiff's call; "that one
important way to grow in mutual understanding and unity consists in improving
our knowledge of one another". (John
Paul II, 1995a, §24) By pointing out the errors of the past
and disseminating this knowledge, I am attempting to curb similar events
occurring in the future, and also attempting to inspire a sense of ecumenism
based on a full knowledge of the relationship between East and West. John
Paul II called on members of the Eastern Catholic Churches in particular
to participate in the bridging needed between the separated brethren of
the East and the Catholic Church, stating that they "play
a constructive role in the dialogue of love and in the theological dialogue
at both the local and international levels". (John
Paul II, 1995b, §60) If lessons are indeed learnt from labours
such as these then perhaps the vision of John Paul II may become the reality:
"For full catholicity, every nation, every
culture has its own part to play in the universal plan of salvation. Every
particular tradition, every local Church must remain open and alert to
the other Churches and traditions and, at the same time, to universal
and catholic communion; were it to remain closed in on itself, it too
would run the risk of becoming impoverished". (John
Paul II, 1985, §27)
In writing, I am also aware of the truth of Montaigne's words that in
matters of ecumenism "we need a judge not
attached to either party, free from preference and passion, which is impossible
among Christians". (Montaigne, 1952,
II, p. 332) I stake a claim and passion
for both the Western and Eastern Churches, for my goal is simply to stimulate
a discussion on what hinders the path to Church unity and to establish
within the reader's mind the long-awaited need for catholic thought.
Meyendorff says it in this manner: "Agreement
needs critical study of one's own past and present but, first and foremost,
a vision, a common discovery of the "realized eschatology" which
makes the church to be the Church". (Meyendorff,
1983, p. 64)
TO
PART III>>>
ARTICLE
NAVIGATION: PART I | PART II | PART III | PART IV | PART V
|
Andrew
Thomas Kania is a visiting scholar at Oxford University where
he is completing a book on Dag Hammerskold. He has taken 12 months
leave of absence from his position as Director of Spirituality at
Aquinas College, Manning in Western Australia to complete this book.
Prior to this appointment at Aquinas Dr. Kania was a lecturer for
the School of Religious Education at the University of Notre Dame
Australia as well as for the Catholic Institute of Western Australia
at Edith Cowan and Curtin Universities. Dr. Kania belongs to the
Ukrainian Church and is interested in ecumenical issues as well
as contemporary problems facing religious educators.
|
©2007
Dr Andrew Thomas Kania
[Andrew Kania's Archive]
|