|
Feeling discriminated against because one is a "different"
sort of Catholic
In 2001 I had the privilege to attend a Retreat for Ukrainian Catholic
Youth. During a discussion session, I addressed the group, comprised of
young men and women between the ages of 16-25, and all born in Australia,
of some of the problems I had had to face growing up as an Eastern Catholic
in a predominately Latin Church nation such as Australia.
Believing that my experiences were expressing but an interesting historical
vignette rather than a contemporary reality, I was soon awoken from this
fantasy by what can only be described as an avalanche of similar experiences
from people up to twenty years my junior. Basically, nothing had really
changed. One retreatant described to me how he, and his family, who lived
in country Victoria, had been told, by a local Roman Rite priest, that
attending a Ukrainian Catholic liturgy on Sunday did not fulfil Catholic
obligation at 'Mass'; another retreatant described how his Confirmation
as an infant was not recognized by the local Roman Rite Chaplain of a
Catholic School; another, described how on joining the line of pilgrim-communicants
at Lourdes in a Roman Rite Church, and having crossed herself in the Byzantine
style (drawing the Sign of the Cross from right to left, three times)
she was pulled out of the line by an usher and told: "Only for Catholics".
Further, I was informed that none of the young people before me had been
encouraged in Catholic Schools to preserve their Byzantine Signing of
the Cross and all had adopted, during School hours at least
the Roman Rite Signing. In addition to this, those among my audience who
had received Holy Eucharist as infants were not allowed to receive the
Eucharist at the Catholic Schools until after their Latin Church
classmates had made their First Holy Communion. In the latter case, what
is so astonishing is that the Eucharist, be it celebrated and consecrated
in both Eastern and Western Catholic Churches is the same real
presence of Christ; and a fully initiated member of the Catholic Church
is exactly that fully initiated.
Most Roman Rite Catholics are oblivious to the Eastern
Lung of the Church
It would be true to say that outside of the Holy Land and Eastern Europe,
most Roman Rite Catholics, are oblivious to the existence of the Eastern
Catholic Churches and their integral role within the history of the Universal
Church. In fact for the majority of Catholics in the world, to be a Catholic
is to be "Roman Catholic" and these terms are often misused
interchangeably. (In the United Kingdom, many of the Catholic Schools
still designate themselves as 'RC'). That a good number of Catholics perceive
themselves as Roman Catholics can in fact be rationalised if we recall
that the Protestants of the Reformation defined themselves by the nature
of their break from Rome, and defined their opponents by their adherence
to the Pontiff who resided in the Vatican. In retaliation to Protestant
persecution Catholicism has become so defensively Latin that it can be
questioned whether a large part of the Latin Church can see the catholicity
of the Universal Church better for it. Self-preservation always necessitates
a them and us mentality rather than an all-embracing perspective.
Such is the inherited mindset that for a similar majority of people to
be anything different to the Roman Rite is in fact to be non-Catholic.
This difficulty in recognizing the Eastern lung
of the Universal Church prevents many in the Latin Church from discovering
the fullness of their own particular Church Tradition for it is
in the comparison of the Rites that we come to a fuller understanding
of our own Traditions, and spiritual heritage.
In this essay I wish to explore some of the
inherent issues behind the latinization of the Catholic Church, their
roots and their impact on the Eastern Catholic Churches; and how these
latinizations have in fact delayed the process of full reconciliation
with the majority of Eastern Christians who remain separate from the Universal
Communion the Orthodox.
I ask for a certain amount of forbearance from my brothers and sisters
of the East, both Catholic and Orthodox, for I understand that each of
these sister Churches has their own particular perspective on ecumenical
matters, which includes their own particular wounds. In this essay my
area of focus lies primarily on the experiences of one of the Eastern
Churches as an example, this being the Ukrainian Church, numerically the
largest of the Eastern Churches in communion with the See of Peter.
TO
PART II>>>
ARTICLE
NAVIGATION: PART I | PART II | PART III | PART IV | PART V
|
Andrew
Thomas Kania is a visiting scholar at Oxford University where
he is completing a book on Dag Hammerskold. He has taken 12 months
leave of absence from his position as Director of Spirituality at
Aquinas College, Manning in Western Australia to complete this book.
Prior to this appointment at Aquinas Dr. Kania was a lecturer for
the School of Religious Education at the University of Notre Dame
Australia as well as for the Catholic Institute of Western Australia
at Edith Cowan and Curtin Universities. Dr. Kania belongs to the
Ukrainian Church and is interested in ecumenical issues as well
as contemporary problems facing religious educators.
|
©2007
Dr Andrew Thomas Kania
[Andrew Kania's Archive]
|